Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1323 <br />September 14, 1988 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />2. The applicant has failed to provide the required survey, plat map, and <br />certified property owners list, which are requirements noted on the <br />variance application form. Envelopes with address labels were <br />submitted and the neighbors have been notified of the Public Hearing. <br />3. Per the site plan sketched byIstaff, the following variances are <br />required in order for this deck construction to continue: <br />A) Construction in the 0-73' setback zone where no construction <br />is normally allowed. The proposed deck is approximately 58' from <br />the normal shoreline. <br />B) Hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone, excluding the paved road <br />from the talc .lation is 20.0%, and ..ith t►.e deck would increase <br />to 27.4%. <br />C) Per the average lakeshote setback diagram, the applicant's <br />deck encroaches approximately 10' lakeward of the average <br />lakeshore setback lire, as defined by structure on the <br />neighbc+ring proterties. <br />Discussion - <br />The applicant's only legitimate tie, Aship in staff's opinion is that <br />the existing house is located in the 0-75' setback zone, and was <br />constructed prior to the 75, set` A requirement. The actual house <br />strurture extends towards the lakes► in such a manner that !any deck on <br />that side of they h: - 1! wi 11 require ,. average se, hack variance. hriA a <br />hardcover perspective, the F,operty has v-:cessive hardcover percentages <br />based on code stanaards, but does not contain excessive unracessary herd <br />surface areas that could be removed t-3 mitigate the nardcover addition:. <br />ftaf f casisndation - <br />Given the lack of a sur�,ey which is normally spy ..? 1 +for every <br />variant.:- -if this type, staff finds it diff§cul to recc,wmend approval of <br />the reque+steu variances although the a;-tlicant may have legitimate <br />%�a :dsh,ps fr, req%-eating variances. <br />