My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
10-24-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
9/30/2025 9:11:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/24/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/30/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
556
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IT? ]F ORONO PAGE M2 <br />)ECK PERMIT <br />h.� •. Yn 4. <br />IN ADDITION TO TWOSF REQUIREMENTS, I ALSO HAD MY THREE NEAREST JEIOHBORS ON <br />30THS SIDES OF MY PROPERTY (SIX(NEIGHBORS IN ALL) SIGN A STATEhENT SAYING THAT <br />THEY DID NOT OBJECT TO MY PROJECT. AS I HAVE P.ECENTLY STARTED UP. A NEW BUSINESS <br />;ND MY WORKING HOURS ARE OFTEN 6100 A.M. UNTIL. 10300 OR 11tOG P:'M. PLUS THE <br />=4CT THAT I TOOK A WEEKEND JOB AS A BAP.TENDER TO PAY THE BILI.S.;GR A WHILE, IT <br />TOOK ME A COUPLE OF WEEKS TO PUT ALL THIS 'INFORMATION Ti-GET-R.".-'AG SOON AS I <br />-LAD ALL OF THIS INFORMATION, ABOUT •10 DAYS TO TWO WEEKS AFTL2 THE ORGINAL STOP <br />AORK ORDER, I MAILED EVERYT►•IING THAT I HAD TO THE CITY. THE NEXT TIME THAT I <br />-4EARD FROM ANYONE REGARDING THIS MATTER WAS THE JULY 222nd LETTER FROM LYLE <br />]MAN. <br />NEEDLESS TO SAY I WAS MORE THAN UPSET. I ZALLED THE CITY AND THEY ADVISED ME <br />THAT THEY NEVER HAD RECEIVED MY ORGINAL '3UBMISSION AND THAT I WOULD HAVE TO <br />AGAIN FILE ALL OF THE NEEDED FORMS. WHAT HAPPENED TO MY ORIGNAL FILINF STILL <br />STUMPS ME AS I NEVER RECEIVED IT BACK AND COULD ONLY ASSUME THAT IF I SENT IT <br />TO THE WRONG ADDRESS IT WOULD BE RETURNED. <br />AFTER AGAIN COMPLING ALL OF THE INFORAATION WHICH YOU NEED, I HAND DELIVERED <br />THIS INFORMATION. IN MY EARLIER TELEPHONE CONVERSATION, I WAS ALSO INFORMED <br />OF THE $150.00 FILING CHARGE. THIS WAS NOT IINCLUDFD IN MY FIRST SUBMISSION <br />AND I BELIEVE THAT 1S WHERE THE PROBLEM ACTUALLY AROSE REGARDING THE "LOST <br />FIRST SUBMISSION. <br />THAT BASICALLY SPIN,--' US OF TO DATE. THERE ARE ABOUT FIVE HOURS OF' WORI'. LEFT <br />TO DO UN THIS PROJECT. THE PEOPLE LIVING ON CRYSTAL DAY ROAD HAVE NO OBJECTIONS <br />TO THE COMPLETION OF THIS PROJECT. CERTAINLY. A DEC► FACING THE LAI.E DOES NOT <br />I NTERFER WITH ANY AE7 HE7 IC DESIGN WHI17H THE CITY FATHE$ S MAY HAVE FOR THE l Ai E <br />FROr4T. IN FACT THERE ARE VERY FEW CAFE FRONT PROPERTIES IN THIS AREA WHICH DO <br />NOT HAVE AT LEAST A DECI EXPOSURE FACING THE LAI•E. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A <br />LAND SURVEY I THINI THAT I HAVE COMPLETED ALL OF YOUR REQUIRED FORMS. I WOULD <br />HOFE THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME THAT PAYING $600 TO $800 FOR A LAND SURVEY <br />FGR A PROJECT WHICH COSTS UNDER: $600 TO COMPLETE 1S AN ONEROUS PRICE TO FAY FOR <br />SUCH A PROJECT AND THAT YOU WILL WAIVE THIS REQUIREMENT. LASTLY. ► <br />WOULD THIN► THAT YOU WOULD AGREE WITH ME. A SLOTTED WOODLN DECK DOES NOT HAVE <br />MUCH OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL INFACT. IN FACT. I FAIL TO SEE WHERE. THERE I.: ANY <br />MEASURAFLE CHANGE ON THE RUNOFF PATTERNS OF tY PROPERTY DUE TO THIS ,'E:W <br />FXF'OSUFL . <br />I CEF 1..,NLY HOPE T -iAT WE CAN PUT THIS SITU"TION TO SEE. I I NGW THF;T THERE <br />MUST BE MUCH WEIGHTIER PRO'.+LEMS WHICH YOU SHOULD GO GN 10. Mr SIMPLE DESIRE <br />`IS TO COMPLETE TH1., PROJECT AS SOON I CAr4 AND BE ABLE TO ENJOY Tr - LIFESTYLE <br />WHICH THE LATE PROVIDES THE RESIDENCE OF OUR AREA. <br />$,NCERELY. <br />art �l - <br />"; ON W. FAF AS <br />;'ca CRYSTAL PAY ROAD <br />Okrir'lO. nN `S' 91 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.