My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 10/10/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 10/10/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:45 AM
Creation date
9/29/2025 10:48:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/10/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/29/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
573
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING SEPTEMBER 28,1988 <br />CRYSTAL BAY ROAD CONTINUED <br />had been proposed. Grabek inquired as to how much that would <br />cost. Gerhardson replied, approximately $15,000.00 to put down <br />the sheathing and install the guardrail. The Mayor asked if that <br />would be acceptable to the applicants? The residents indicated <br />that they would not like to look at the guardrail. <br />Mr. Anderson asked if it would be possible to place a more <br />permanent "road closed" sign at each end of the street? That <br />would allow the snow fence to be taken down. The Mayor stated <br />that it was unfortunate that a guardrail would need to be <br />temporary installed, but if it was necessary to make the road <br />safe, so be it. Mr. Schupp stated that he did not think the City <br />could legally place a guardrail where they are intending. Mr. <br />Schupp stated that in lieu of the guardrail he would either work <br />with the City to bring his bank back up to a safe level; or he <br />would give the City a little bit or extra room so a shoulder <br />could be installed in that location. Public Works Director <br />Gerhardson explained that the guardrail was only temporary until <br />such time as Mr. Schupp repaired his bank. The posts for the <br />guardrail would then be cut off below ground level. Mr. Erger <br />rroposed another plan wherein the City be granted an easement for <br />e purpose of working on the property until such time as a <br />retaining wall is built. The easement would then be vacated. <br />Rather than bringing the blacktop right to the edge of the cliff, <br />why not comply with the normal grade by adding a dump truck of <br />dirt and create a more gentle slope. Then the residents could <br />bring their banks up to par. If there is a 20' retaining wall, <br />Mr. Erger is afraid that it would be impossible to bring in <br />enough dirt to sufficiently bring the bank back up. Public Works <br />Director Gerhardson stated that he would like the opportunity to <br />work out those details at a later time. <br />Councilmember Callahan interpreted his understanding that <br />this matter was to return to the Planning Commission to get their <br />input. Callahan suggested that Gerhardson and the residents work <br />together to reach a resolve before the Planning Commission <br />meeting. <br />Councilmember Peterson inquired as to whether the road would <br />be made into a private road if it is deadended. Gerhardson <br />replied that the road would not become private. He added that if <br />access off of the cul-de-sac was needed, from that point on, the <br />road would be private. Peterson asked about the 6 people with <br />the dirt road. Gerhardson replied that it would be those same <br />people. Peterson: stated that she was talking about 2 different <br />roads, the dirt road and Crystal Bav Road. The property owners <br />with the dirt road. Gerhardson stated that those people would <br />have 2 accesses at this point. the road were closed they <br />would just have a hack access. , residents did not obtain <br />their right-of-way from Dakota Rc. hen they would not have a <br />legl access. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.