My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
9/29/2025 10:48:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/10/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/29/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
573
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
e_ <br />To: Mayor Grabek & Orono Council Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: October 5, 1988 <br />Subject: #1332 Marcelo Gumucio, 980 Ferndale Road West - <br />After -the -Fact Variances - Resolution <br />Application - After -the -fact height variance for driveway entry pillars in <br />excess of 3h' in height, in conjunction with setback variance for such <br />pillars. <br />Zoning District - LR-lA <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Notice of Planning Commission Action Dated 9/21/88 <br />Exhibit B - Planning Commission Minutes Dated 9/19/88 <br />Exhibit C - Memo & Exhibits of 9/15/88 <br />Exhibit D - Proposed Resolution <br />Discussion - <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of September 15, 1988. The <br />applicant constructed driveway pillars on the property on either side of <br />the driveway, being 5.5' in height, or 2' higher than the 3.5' normal <br />height limitation for such structures. <br />The Planning Commission at their September 19th meeting voted 4-1 to <br />approve a height and setback variance for the pillars that have been <br />constructed, finding that: <br />A) The pillars do not create a hazard to the users of the public <br />roadway nor .Ae private driveway because of the 15-20' setback from <br />the actual travelled roadway, and will not impede road maintenance. <br />B) Separation distance between the pillars provides adequate <br />clearance for emergency vehicles that may have to service the <br />property. <br />C) The pillars contain integral lighting fixtures to provide for <br />safety of this driveway entrance. <br />The Planning Commission recommended the following condition: <br />1. Applicant is placed on notice that if at some future date, light <br />fixtures are placed on *op of the pillars, such lighting must be <br />directed downward and tl')e intensity must be at a level so as to not <br />create vision problems U--7- the users of the public roadway. <br />Staff would note that the applicant has paid double the normal <br />variance fee because this is an after -the -fact application. if the Council <br />approves the requested variances, applicant will be required to obtain the <br />appropriate building permit. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.