My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
9/29/2025 10:48:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/10/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/29/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
573
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
No <br />Dlanning Commission member Junnson ruestioned the pictures <br />Mr. Keiser submitted. Mr. Keiser explained that the pictures <br />showed neighboring properties with d•_cks extending more toward <br />the lake than Mr. Papas's deck. <br />Planning Commission member Bellows reiterated Hanson's <br />explanatio.: of documents required with the submittal of a <br />variance ar lication. M.L. Keiser asked if Mr. Papas would then <br />have to sp...id $600.00 to have a survey done? Bellows replied <br />that it would not be necessary to do another survey if there was <br />an existing survey. Kelley stated that the certified propert <br />o;aners list was also not included with the application. <br />Assistant Planning a.-ld Zoni..g Administrator Gaffron stated that <br />the list must have beeii misplAced b. the owner. City personnel <br />could verify that envelopes and labels with neighboring property <br />address3s had been received with the application. Gaffron <br />verified that the notices were legally sent, but the list <br />indicating those persons was missing. <br />Johnson G'sited that he could understand the confusion on <br />applicant'.- be^ if regarding the variances. dowever, had Mr. <br />Papas applied fo.L a permit to build the deck he would have been <br />informed of all the requirements. <br />It was moved by Planning Commission member Cohen, seconded <br />by Planning Commission member Hanscn, to table application #1323 <br />to allow the applicant time to submit all required information. <br />Motion, Aye -5, Nays=J, Motion passed. <br />#1324 MR. AND MRS. WILLIAM GREGORY <br />1099 TAML ACK DRIVE <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />PUBLIC HEARING 7:35 P.M. - 7:40 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />noted. <br />The applicants -ere present for this matter, but were <br />rep csented by M- tt :d Peep from Minnetonka Portable <br />Dredging. <br />Assistant Planning s Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained <br />that the applicants were seeking a coneitional use permit for <br />excavation within an existing wetland a a to create a pond. The <br />designated wetland is approximately .6 of an acr 4. Excavation <br />would occur at the northwesterly en.-i of the wetland and will <br />create a pond approximately 120' in Length and about 60' in <br />wid.th. The spoils would be placed a enq the east anu south side <br />of, the existing driveway. The City Eng.ineer has reviewed this <br />nppiic 'on and recci.imended approval The Minnehaha Creek <br />'paters istrict has also recommended °. ioval of this project <br />subjec, to erosion control and rest, ion of the disturbed <br />areas. <br />Chairman Kei ley stated tha�_ at one time there was concern <br />about soil recnoval from the prcferty. He inquirei whether there <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.