Laserfiche WebLink
ZONING FILE NO. 1306 <br />CITY OF ORONO NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br />P.O. Box 66 <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 473-7357 Date of Notice: 7/28/88 <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />TO: Timothy F. Keegan COPIES TO: Jim Olson <br />Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Bonestroo, Anderlik & Assoc. <br />Mears Park Centre, 230 East 5th St 2335 W Hwy 36 <br />St. Paul, MN 55101 St. Paul, MN 55113 <br />---------------- -----------------------------------------•------------- <br />TYPE OF APPLICATII Conditional Use Permit <br />------------------- .1 ------------------------------------------------------ <br />DATE OF MEETIING: 7/18/88 VOTE: 6 For 0 Against <br />Planning Commission recommends the following: <br />Tabled for reasons noted below <br />NOTES AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS: <br />The Planning Commission tabled all action on the conditional use <br />permit for the MWCC seeking approval of construction of a building that <br />would contain a lift station/generator as part of the upgrading of the <br />existing Metro sewer lines, subject to the MWCC filing for the appropriate <br />subdivision application that would divide off the 2,880 s.f. parcel from <br />the existing 30,300 s.f. parcel. In a recent conversation with the MWCC, <br />staff was advised that the subdivision application would not be filed for <br />the upcoming meeting, but would make the deadline for the September 19, <br />1Qa8 meeting. <br />Staff will re-scnedule the conditional use permit at the same meeting <br />as the review of the subdivision application. It should be noted that the <br />Planning Commission did have some comments regarding the proposed use of <br />the property and would like the following items addressed by the MWCC: <br />1. Will there be noise, or any special odors emitting from this structure <br />and the proposed use? <br />2. Provide landscaping - it was noted by the Planning Commission that all <br />the other lift stations an3 improvements with the original upgi:ding <br />plans provide_: landscap: ng. This application provided no such <br />landscaping and we request landscaping for the structure. <br />3. The building design has been questioned by the members of the Planning <br />Commission finding it not appropriate for the surrounding neighborhood <br />suggesting a re -design of roof and making the structure look more <br />residential rather than for public works type use. Note other similar <br />structures, possibly in Eden Prairie, that have been designed for <br />MWCC's use that would be more appropriate than the design plan of this <br />structure. <br />4. Parking area shuuld be defined on site plan. <br />Please see that your information is submitted at least two weeks <br />before the scheduled meeting for the review of the subdivision application. <br />It is staff's hope to get a comprehensive action and approval on the part <br />of the Planning Commission at the September meeting. <br />Tim, Flease contact my office at your earliest convenience as I would <br />like to discuss the filing of the applications sometime within the fourth <br />week of August as I will be out of town the first two weeks of September <br />rr and it. would be best that I complete the review of this sj.ecific <br />application since I commenced the review (473-7357). <br />