My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4937
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4900 - 4999 (November 25,2002 - June 23,2003)
>
Resolution 4937
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 1:16:24 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:16:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� , <br /> � O� � <br /> O O <br /> • �g � CITY of ORONO <br /> z . <br /> � �.� . � � . <br /> :,�� ti <br /> ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`9kEs�I�g'�G NO. 4 � 4 � � <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on February 19, 2003 <br /> and recommended approval by a vote of 6 to 0. � <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: . ' <br /> A. There was a lot line rearrangement in 1976 to correct a substandard setback. <br /> Another lot line rearrangement would only create a substandard setback for <br /> the adjacent property. <br /> B. Cutting back the eaves on the north side of the residence and moving the <br /> . foundation of the residence 6" is not economically feasible or reasonable <br /> because the construction is nearly complete: <br /> C. Cutting back the eaves on the north side of the residence and not the south <br /> � � would result in the residence losingf its symmetry. <br /> • . D. The proj ect to construct a new single family residential home on the property <br /> is nearly complete after a series of errors which were not realized until long. . <br /> �after they occurred.' <br /> 5. The City Couneil finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or di�culty; is <br /> � necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the . <br /> City. . <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and ' <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> �celfare of the community. <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.