Laserfiche WebLink
05/16/11 PC <br />Subject: #11-3505, Thomas & Martha McCune, 1473 Bay Ridge Road, <br />Side Setback Variance <br />Public Hearing <br />Background <br />In order to repair an ice dam issue with the existing roof the property owner would like to <br />reconstruct the roof over the older portion of their home with a slightly steeper pitch. The <br />resulting increase in height would be an additional 2' 11" from the existing roof. The existing <br />home does not meet the 30-foot side setback as required for principal structures within the LR- <br />1A zoning district. Technically the increased roof height in the substandard setback is <br />considered an expansion of an existing nonconformity; side yard setback variances are required <br />in order to do the project as proposed. <br />Side Yard Setback Variance <br />The applicants' property is nonconforming with respect to area and width. The existing home <br />does not meet the required 30-foot side setback on either side lot line. No additional living <br />space is being proposed. The 2' 11" increase in height within the substandard side setback area <br />will not encroach closer than the existing home to the properties on either side of the <br />applicants' property. <br />Updated Variance Analysis <br />As the planning commission is aware, there have been multiple changes to law regarding how a <br />municipality must review an application for a variance. The "undue hardship" analysis has been <br />replaced with the "practical difficulties" analysis. Staff is currently working on updating the <br />ordinance to ensure that it conforms to the statutory analysis of practical difficulties. While the <br />current code directs staff, planning commission and the council to perform a "hardship" <br />analysis; this application will actually be viewed consistent with the new practical difficulties <br />analysis. <br />The applicants' variance request is reasonable and necessary in order to avoid additional <br />damage to their property caused by ice dams. The proposed addition is a vertical expansion <br />that will result in minimal additional massing of the house. No additional living space is being <br />proposed and the applicants' request results in minimal negative impact of adjacent properties. <br />Staff finds the location of the existing home creates a unique circumstance not created by the <br />applicants and that granting the applicants' request is in harmony with the purpose and intent <br />of the ordinance and will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the side setback variances in order to reconstruct the <br />roof 16.7 feet on the south side lot line and 14 feet on the north. <br />Tim �CCi�,�►G <br />157627v2 <br />