My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bay Ridge Road
>
1449 Bay Ridge Road - 10-117-23-34-0003
>
Land Use
>
00-2557 VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 2:03:35 PM
Creation date
9/25/2025 2:03:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 19, 2000 <br />(#2556 Barbara and Collins Cavender, Continued) <br />Boyer stated due to the narrowness of Rest Point Road and the lack of parking available <br />on the street, the house and garage need to be located further back to accommodate a <br />car in the driveway. <br />Stoddard commented he would be willing to approve a variance to the front yard setback , <br />but that the Applicants need to comply with the 15 percent structural coverage limit. <br />Stoddard suggested this application be tabled to allow the Applicant time to revise his plans. <br />Stoddard stated the Applicant probably will not be allowed to construct a patio or walkway <br />to the lake. <br />Mrs. Cavender stated the patio is located off to the side . <br />Nygard noted the patio is still located within the 0-75' setback. <br />Smith recommended the Applicants attempt to adhere to the 15 percent structural coverage <br />limit and relocate the house closer to the road . <br />Kluth indicated the number one issue is the structural coverage , with the 15 percent needing <br />to be complied with. Kluth stated he would like to see the hardcover under the 25 percent <br />limit as well due to environmental concerns. Kluth noted the 0-75' setback is the most <br />critical as it relates to hardcover due to the impact to the lake. <br />Hawn stated it appears the Planning Commission would like the Applicants to adhere to the <br />15 percent structural coverage limit. Hawn inquired whether the Applicants would be willing <br />to extend the 60 day review period should the Plann i ng Commission table this application . <br />Weinberger indicated City Staff will continue to work with the Applicants. <br />Stoddard commented the front yard setback should be compatible with the other houses in <br />the neighborhood, and suggested the Appl i cants cons ider locating the house 35 feet from <br />the lake. <br />Smith commented she would like to see the house 35 to 40 feet from the lake . <br />Stoddard i nquired whether the Applicants wou ld like the Planning Commission to table their <br />application. <br />Mr. Cavender requested their application be tabled. <br />Stoddard moved, Kluth seconded , to table Application #2556, Barbara and Collins <br />Cavender, 1405/1395 Rest Point Road, Variances, to allow the Applicants time to <br />revise their plans, and to extend the 60 day review period. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays O. <br />(#12) #2557 JUDITH AND DANIEL MCATHIE, 1449 BAY RIDGE ROAD -VARIANCES, <br />11 :50 p.m. -11 :56 p .m. <br />Judith and Daniel McAthie, Applicants, were present. <br />Bottenberg stated the Applicants are requesting variances to permit the addition of a garage <br />Page 29
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.