My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bay Ridge Road
>
1425 Bay Ridge Road - 10-117-23-34-0017
>
Land Use
>
02-2834 CUP
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2025 1:40:06 PM
Creation date
9/25/2025 1:39:04 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 21, 2002 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#3) #02-2834 ROBERT AND JULIE WIENS, 1425 BAY RIDGE ROAD, Continued <br />reminded them he could still go through the proper channels to construct something much more <br />obtrusive than he has here. <br />Hawn reiterated that Mr. Wiens has the right to do what he can to improve his property. She <br />indicated that she was struggling to see how this could be a problem to the neighbors when it <br />would be mostly blocked anyway. <br />Chair Smith complimented the applicant on his willingness to cooperate with the neighbors and <br />stated that, in reality, he could even remove the large row of pine trees on his property ifhe <br />chose to. She indicated that instead he is proposing to improve his property. <br />Rahn stated that, short of the berm issue, the applicant could plant rows of trees along and <br />around the curve without the City's permission. <br />Godfrey questioned whether he could continue to come back to the City to request additional fill. <br />Gaffron stated that the City code does not talk about a maximum per year, but a limit could be <br />even further defined in the motion. <br />Wiens stated that he wished to do the project right and invited everyone to come take a look at <br />his work. <br />Chair Smith suggested the applicant consider either tabling his application in order to work with <br />the neighbors, or moving it forward as the application exists currently. <br />Wiens stated that he preferred to move forward sooner than later and asked for further <br />discussion. <br />Mabusth asked how many cubic yards of fill the Commission was being asked to approve at this <br />time. <br />Wiens stated that application is for 1500-2000 cubic yards of fill. <br />Gaffron pointed out that 700 cubic yards of fill would provide a 4' high berm. <br />Hawn suggested they design a motion that defines the fill as the amount required to obtain a 4' <br />high berm and not identify a certain number. <br />While he had hoped to proceed, Wiens stated that he had also hoped for a higher berm along <br />County Road 15 than the 4' in this proposal. He indicated that he would go back to his engineer <br />in order for him to redesign the plan. Wiens felt he could stay within the 500 cubic yard <br />allowance and still construct an 8' berm along County Road 15 and then return next month with <br />Page 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.