My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4926
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4900 - 4999 (November 25,2002 - June 23,2003)
>
Resolution 4926
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2019 2:08:28 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:12:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1,, 0 At <br /> O O <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> 14•4 � ,i$1A6.', G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CIT COUNCIL <br /> �ESII0 NO. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. Planning Commission finds that a lot area variance is not required since the <br /> existing house foundation and part of the first floor walls will be used, <br /> without structural repairs. If the foundation which is located within the 30' <br /> front yard setback is found to be replaced, the application needs to be <br /> revisited and reviewed as new construction. <br /> B. The existing residence was built in 1920,prior to existing zoning standards. <br /> C. The hardship is the existing house location in relation to front lot lines. <br /> C. The hardcover in the 250-500' setback zone is below the allowed 30%. <br /> D. Lot coverage by structures will be 17.2%,above the 15%limit. However,the <br /> applicant is removing the shed decreasing the amount of lot coverage by <br /> structure that currently exists on the property. <br /> E. The irregularly shaped property is due to a subdivision which occurred in <br /> 1973. <br /> F. The new second story will not adversely affect any adjacent neighbor's view <br /> of the lake. <br /> G. The applicant has requested to add to the existing house rather than build a <br /> new structure on the property. The owner has stated the existing foundation <br /> will not be removed or altered as part of the remodeling plan. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.