Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

TO: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Planning Commission Members City Administrator Bernhardson FROM: Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator DATE: April 13, 1988 SUBJ: #1262 Curtis Hagfors, 1412 Baldur Park Road - Variance - Public Hearing Zoning District - LR-lC Single Family Lakeshore Residential 1/2 Acre Application - Major additions to existing house, requiring hardcover variance, proposed replacement of existing garage will also require a street setback variance. The existing house is 9.6' from the side lot line, and the addition will require a 0.4' side setback variance. List of Ezhibits A - Application B - Plat Map C - Property owners List D - Survey E - Applicant's hardcover calculations as revised by staff F - Prelimin..ry house plans Pertinent Facts - 1. The lot is 50' in width. Applicant proposes to widen his existing house to 30', so that with a 9.6' side setback variance to the left side, the right side will be 10.4' from the right side lot line, not requiring a variance on that side. 2. The existing house and proposed additions are in line with the adjacent houses. No average lakeshore setback variance is required. 3. Applicant plans to extend his existing main floor level deck the entire width of the house at a depth of 7'. The adjacent houses do not appear to have decks. The proposed deck extension technically extends about 2' into the average house setback but will have no visual impact on the views enjoyed by the neighboring property owner. 4. The existing garaqe is 6.7' from the side lot line and approximately 12' from the street lot line, with doors facing onto the street. This garage will be removed and replaced with a 24'x 22' garaqe located 10' from the side lot line but still only 17' from the street lot line with doors facing the street, hence a 13' street setback variance is required. 5. There is no hardcover in the 0-75' setback zone. Hardcover in the 75-250' zone has been calculated by staff as 25.2% existing, 35.3% proposed. Staff's calculations differ substantially from the calculations by applicant's surveyor, apparently due to s•a' f's consistent exclusion of roof overhangs as hardcover. This is staff's assumption given that the surveyor did not provide details Showing how he arrived at his fiqures.