My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4921
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4900 - 4999 (November 25,2002 - June 23,2003)
>
Resolution 4921
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 1:04:30 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:04:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. , <br /> � O� <br /> � O �:� O <br /> �.. C ITY of ORONO <br /> ,� -.�.;.. � . <br /> � , ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . ��l ��'~ <br /> `9k'EsS�S�` NO. t� � `.� �_ <br /> e) The Planning Commission recommends that an attached garage meeting the <br /> 30' side setback but as near as 35' to the front lot line is appropriate for the <br /> site. . <br /> fl Because the property is in the MLJSA, because this is considered as new <br /> construction,and because there is no altemate drainfield site available on the <br /> property for future use, the Planning Commission recommends that the <br /> existing conforming septic system not be re-used because 20 years of its <br /> - useful life has already been expended and its re-use results in a new home <br /> with a 20-year-old septic system,which is inappropriate for new construction. <br /> g) Due to the proximity of the wetland to the proposed deck on the northeast <br /> . corner of the residence, a wetland delineation should be required of the <br /> applicant prior to approval of construction of the deck to ensure the required <br /> setback is met. <br /> � 7. The Cit Council has considered this a lication includin the findin s and <br /> Y PP g g <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City staff, comments by � <br /> the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. . <br /> 8. The City Council finds that�th�conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty;is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant;and <br /> � �vould be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. � � • <br /> � , <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.