My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4919
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4900 - 4999 (November 25,2002 - June 23,2003)
>
Resolution 4919
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 1:03:53 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:03:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� °� � <br /> • � �� r ° <br /> � CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� , �.,... � <br /> � ti <br /> ti � <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � ��� o4�G . No. � � 1 � : <br /> k'Es8 <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on January 22, 2003 <br /> . and recommended approval by a vote of 7 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: . ,. � <br /> A. The house and deck were constructed in 1968 at this location and require <br /> � safety improvements as a result of the age of the structure; <br /> B. � The replacement of the deck as it currently exists will not increase the <br /> _ existing square footage of hardcover,change the setback from the OHWL nor <br /> � the average lakeshore setback; � <br /> C. The deck is necessary to provide a landing for the two sliding glass doors . <br /> located on the lakeside of the house; and <br /> D. The neighboring views of the lake are not negatively impacted by the <br /> reconstruction of a deck as it currently exists. <br /> 5. The City Council fmds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiaz to it <br /> • and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> : ' � �� the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial properry right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> ' keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. � � <br /> 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> � welfare of the community. , . . , <br /> CONCLUSIONS, ORDER,AND CONDITIONS <br /> Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants <br /> . variances to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivision 1 (B) and Subdivision 2; Section <br /> 10.56, Subdivision 16 (C)#1 and#6; Section 10.56,Subdivision 16(L)#1 to rebuild a second story <br /> deck 67' from the OHWL of Lake Minnetonka where 75' is required,with 5.12%hardcover within <br /> • the 0-75' lakeshore setback zone where no hardcover is permitted and encroaching 71' into the <br /> Page 2 of 5 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.