Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL METING SEPTEMBER 12, 198E <br />ZONING FILE #1313-ETLER CONTINUED <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron gave <br />more details involving this application and showed the Council <br />where the removals and replacements of hardcover would occur. <br />Councilmember Goetten mentioned that she had visited the <br />site and thought that the applicant's proposal improved the <br />present situation. She appreciated the fact that the Ellers were <br />removing as much hardcover as they were installing. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to adopt Resolution #2491. Motion, <br />Ayes=5, Nayes=0, Motion passed. <br />#131 4 GERALD ROWLETTE <br />3775 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2492 <br />Applicants were present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the Rowlettes <br />were seeking a street setback variance for the purpose of <br />installing a sunroom. The sunroom would be located in an <br />existing indentation along the north outer wall of the house. <br />The main issue is hardcover and a patio that the Rowlettes were <br />to have removed in accordance with a variance granted in 1976. <br />The Planning Commission recently recommended approval of this <br />current application based on the removal of half of the concrete <br />patio. Since that time, it had been determined that the patio <br />was split into three sections rather than two. <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />inli ated cn a diagram the configuration of the patio. <br />Councilmember Callahan questioned why the Planning Commission did <br />not have any concern over the number of concrete slabs. <br />Applicant stated that he had informed the Planning Commission <br />that there were two slabs, but upon re-examining the patio, found <br />there to be three slabs. Applicant stated that he would like to <br />remove the outer_ slab, which would mean a removal of lesLi <br />hardcover than recommended by the Planning Commission. <br />May-r Grabek asked applicant why he had not previously <br />removed a concrete patio as directed by thn City. Mr. Rowlette <br />stated Ic.at he had an ice build-up problem in that area. He <br />could remove the ice from the concrete surface, but could not <br />chip the ice from a wocd deck. Mayor Grabek asked Mr. Rowlette if <br />he would also find a reason for not complying with the City <br />should they redirect him to remove a portion of the patio. <br />Applicant stated that he ant the Planning Commission had <br />?is:;ussed this issue and the slab would have to be removed prior <br />to the issuance of the building permit for the sunroom. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson reiterated that applicant was <br />requesting that only one-third of the concrete patio be remcvPd <br />2 <br />