Laserfiche WebLink
It: Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />Pros: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst. Planninq & Znning Administrator <br />Date: July 1.4, 1988 <br />Subj: #1301 Davia and Frederick White, 180 North Shore Drive West - <br />Preliminar Subdivision- rublic Hearing <br />Application - Request for Subdivision of 18 acre parcel into two 2 acre <br />buildable lots and an outlot of approximately 10 acres. <br />7t. .ng District - RR-lB Single Famil,• Rural Residential, 2 acre unsewered. <br />List of Exhibits - <br />A - Application <br />B - Plat Map <br />C - Property Own(z's List - Letter from Neighbor Across Co. Rd. 9 <br />D - Proposed Fula <br />E - Copy of USG;, Tr-djographic Map <br />F - Copy of Prelimin-ry Plat with Staff Notations <br />G - Staff Conceptual iketches <br />Impending Pertinent Facts - <br />1. <br />PRY BUILDABLE <br />WETLAND <br />TOTAL <br />Lot 1 <br />2.006 AC <br />0.998 AC <br />3.004 AC <br />'.ot 2 <br />3.087 <br />1.721 <br />4.808 <br />uut Lot A <br />9.402 <br />--- <br />9.402 <br />Total Parcel <br />Excluding Poads <br />14.495 <br />2.719 <br />1 i.214 <br />2. Lot 1 contains an existing house with existing trench type <br />drainfield. An alternate si�4 <br />has �n tested to the North of the existing <br />house and i.: suitable for <br />nd stem. The <br />existing <br />trench drainfield <br />appears to he functionir, <br />quately now d?l-ing <br />tr <br />dry weather! our <br />records indicate that th., <br />stem has been <br />- problem <br />in the pasu and <br />ultima*-ely w111 require rep.acement in staff's <br />opinion, <br />in the relatively <br />near: future. <br />Proposed Lot 7, as shown on the preliminary p- at, was d,termined by the <br />applicant's site evaluator to not contain sa:table sites for septic <br />systems. The site evaluator has recommended that an additional area from <br />proposed nutlot A be incorporated into Lot 2. That proposed area comprises <br />approx1+*'5t«!ly 1.3 additional acres. Staff concurs with this <br />eco�,;.nendatior and notes that Lot 2, as it is rrently proposed, has a <br />se-,e- ely lim building envelope without s additional acreage. <br />Appp cant has ayreed to this revision. <br />The aApplicants have provided septic testing within the proposed Outlo' <br />