Laserfiche WebLink
Problem Identification and Description <br />Water quality problems in the upper watershed were first identified by the <br />District in the mid-1970's as part of the Upper Watershed Storage and Retention <br />Project (UWIP). The project sought to improve water quality and control flows <br />from the major drainageways tributary to Lake Minnetonka. The Painter Creek <br />project, constructed by the District in 1984-1985, was the first phase of the <br />UWIP and consisted of easement acquisition, several miles of channel <br />improvements, excavation of two sedimentation basins and the construction of <br />four sheet pile weir control structures and one rough fish barrier. The total <br />cost of the project was $510,000 and was financed by a District -wide ad valorem <br />tax levy under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 112. <br />The Board of Managers has designated the Long Lake Creek subwatershed as the <br />second phase of the UWIP and has included the project in the Capital Improvement <br />Program of the District's Chapter 509 Surface Water Management Plan. Results <br />from the computer simulation of watershed hydrology completed in 1986 as part of <br />the preparation of the 509 Plan, along with historical records from the <br />District's on -going hydrologic monitoring pi,ogram, indicate the Long Lake Creek <br />subwatershed contributes a significant portion of runoff into Lake Minnetonka. <br />Data also indicates this runoff can contain elevated concentrations of suspended <br />sediment and phosphorus. Long Lake, which is the primary receiving body for a <br />large portion of the subwatershed's tributary drainage area before outletting <br />into Long Lake Creek, normally exhibits signs of poor water quality in the <br />summer months with water clarity being impacted by high levels of chlorophyll -a <br />(algae) and phosphorus. Long Lake also supports a large population of rough <br />fish. <br />The District believes the poor water quality in Long Lake is related to <br />non -point source (NPS) pollution from the lake's tributary drainage area. <br />Non -point sources of pollution are defined as land management or land use <br />activities that contribute to pollutian as a result of runoff, seepage or <br />percolation. This definition includes rural and urban land uses, as well as <br />specialty land uses such as transportation, and recognizes that both surface and <br />groundwater can be affected by non-point\sources of pollution. Major sources of <br />NPS pollution include: agricultural runoff; pesticide and fertilizer use; <br />feedlot runoff; urban runoff from streets, yards and construction sites; <br />leachate from septic systems; highway de-icing chemicals; dredging and drainage <br />activities; and impacts from the loss of wetlands. <br />III. MPCA CLEAN WATER PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM <br />The Clean Water Partnership Program was enacted in 1987 by the State Legislature <br />to protect and improve surface and groundwater in Minnesota through financial <br />and technical assistance to local units of government to control water pollution <br />associated with land use and land management activities. The program is <br />administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency which may award grants <br />for up to 50 percent of the eligible cost for the development of a diagnostic <br />study and implementation plan and the implementation of that plan. Other <br />available sources of state and federal funding can also be used to fund up to <br />20 percent of the remaining local share of the project. <br />