My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-28-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
09-28-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
9/22/2025 11:45:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
9/28/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/22/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
303
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
nISCUSSION - <br />Mr. Singer notes that the safety problems along County Road 51 are not <br />an issue of balancing but requires that safety be primary over any <br />convenience as it relates to parking for public access. The situation is <br />generally not great, however the City records indicate no personal injury <br />accidents along this area for the last 2 1/2 years. Actual jurisdiction <br />for road marking i.� with the County. Should the City recommend safety <br />improvements to the County along 51 following Mr. Singer's suggestion would <br />remove approximately 6 potentially "commitable" spaces which perhaps the <br />City could find substitute slots numbers to replace those. As noted in Mr. <br />Singer's letter, the City has --fisted nc parking both to the west along 19 <br />and also south along 19 on both sides of this parking posted was done in <br />about 1980. It should also be noted that Mr. Singer has indicated that the <br />proposed solution back in 1985 for pedestrian walk every 100 to 200' was <br />not an appropriate solut-)n because of limitations on sheds in the <br />lakeshore. The City has generally approved small sheds in this areafor <br />storage of equipment of the type noted by Mr. Singer in his letter upon <br />applica` 4.on for a vai._.znce for specifically that reason. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Issues #1 - Safety A <br />1. Request posting the entire street no parking. <br />2. Wider_ the shoulder (this may have some relationship to the <br />MWCC project foi the Orono Minnetonka Beach interceptor). <br />a. Berm curb for drainage. <br />b. Double stripping for creating a bike pedestrian lane. <br />C. Pedestrian crosswalk. <br />3. Elimination of up to 6 parking slots in- �rmittently spaced <br />among eixsting over to improve line of sight <br />4- Take no action. <br />�. Idble. <br />6. Select the preliminary design after the staff has an initial <br />discussion with the County to see what is acceptable and present <br />such to the neighbors. <br />Issues #2 -Parking Space Commitment <br />1. Take no action. <br />2. Commit all the slots currently along 51. <br />3. Commit a reduce number of slots along 51. <br />4. Find alternative parking slots probably to the east or the <br />west to replace those removed_ <br />a. On street <br />b. Off street <br />5. Table pending the determination of safety aspects. <br />RECOMMENDATION - <br />It is recommended that after an initial discussion at the Council <br />meeting that a rrelim -y solution be _aken to the County to discuss what <br />they conside-- bc. :�asihle and thpt following that this would be <br />presented to ugh: -ors. Fresen.ly the City staff would recommend: <br />a. That ._._u shoulder should be widen approximatley 3' with a bezm <br />curb in conjunction with the MWCC project. This shoulder would <br />encrcjch further into the exi-tinq lake -hone and would be additional <br />hardcover within the 0-75'. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.