My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1436 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-43-0006
>
Land Use
>
93-1900, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2025 12:25:51 PM
Creation date
9/18/2025 12:25:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
# ""' ( <br />(", <br />To: Jeanne Mabusth, Planning Commission and Council of Orono <br />Regarding: Hardship/description of unusual property conditions for new home <br />construction at 1436 Baldur Park Road <br />1436 Baldur Park Road is a small and substandard SO-foot lakeshore lot, platted <br />before current zoning standards . On this lot is a deteriorat i ng cabin that is <br />currently boarded up and has no salvage value. This structure will have to be <br />removed from the lot--an event that is happening one-by-one on Baldur Park Road, <br />as old substandard cabins are replaced with small but modern year-round homes. <br />However, the existing structure, despite its condition, is nicely aligned with <br />every other nearby house on Baldur Park Road , forming a smooth crescent of homes <br />that wrap around the northeast side of the small peninsula that juts into North <br />Arm. <br />The small size and narrowness of the lot , plus our desire to preserve the <br />existing tress , will likely lead us to ask for three variances: <br />1. We will need to keep the "front: <br />position as the existing structure. <br />virtually identical to that of all our <br />lake than what is there now. <br />(lake side) of our new home in the same <br />This will require a lakeshore variance <br />neighbors, and certainly no closer to the <br />2 . We do not need a side set back variance for the foot print of the home but are <br />requesting one for the garage and turn around area, to keep from having a <br />"tunnel" of hardcover. The garages of both adjacent properties are 5 feet from <br />the property along on opposite sides of our requested side set back. Therefore, <br />this would create larger grass areas between all three garages. Also an attached <br />garage and turn around creates a safer access to the street . <br />3. We have put most of our effort and design time into minimizing hardcover. <br />However, we still need a hardcover variance . Here are our ideas so far : <br />-We will build a small home, appropriate for the lot. <br />-Lot coverage within the lake setback will be virtually no greater than what is <br />there now , <br />-Home will be a two-story, so we can keep a small footprint. To keep the <br />footprint as small as possible, we have creatively designed living area in and <br />above a portion of the attached garage footprint. <br />-Our current plan could get b y with a single driveway for part of its length, <br />minimizing hardcov er in the t y pical "tunnel" of driveway-garage-house. <br />We are trying to obey the rules as best as we can but would appreciate your <br />creative input as we continue this process .
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.