My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-11-27 Septic System Design Report
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
D
>
Dickey Lake Drive
>
755 Dickey Lake Drive- 34-118-23-22-0009
>
Septic
>
1981-11-27 Septic System Design Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2025 12:23:48 PM
Creation date
9/18/2025 12:18:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
755
Street Name
Dickey Lake
Street Type
Drive
Address
755 Divkey Lake Drive
PIN
3411823220009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
#615 Ringer Subdivision <br />Page 6 <br />Lot 6, Block 2 <br />Peres PA61 thru PA66. Borings BA61 thru BA63. Slopes are nearly <br />level. Mottling occurred below 1.5', with actual water <br />encountered below 5.7'. (Note that soil appears saturated <br />below 2.51) Perc rates were acceptable, although 2 of 6 taken <br />at depth very very slow. Both primary and secondary sites should <br />use mound systems. 100 <br />Lot 1, Block 3 <br />Peres PC11 thru PC14. Boring BC11 and BC12. This lot contains <br />an existing house, garage and barn. The existing septic system <br />is unknown and was not located during my routine inspection in <br />July 1981, although no evidence of failure was noted. A future <br />drainfield site has been tested to the south of the house. Average <br />percolation rate is 21 minutes per inch; soil borings indicate <br />soils suited for a shallow trench or mound system, with mottling <br />beginning at a depth of 5'. This is the highest elevated point <br />in the entire subdivision and appears to be the only lot possibly <br />suited for a shallow trench system. An attempt should be made <br />to locate the existing system to ensure it is within the lot <br />boundaries, although there i3 only a -remote possibility that it <br />isn't. <br />Lot 2, Block 3 <br />Peres PC21 thru PC24. Borings BC21 and BC22. This lot contains <br />an existing house and small shed. The existing septic system is <br />unknown and was not located during my inspection last July. No <br />evidence of system failure is noted. While the existing system <br />undoubtedly consists of trenches, soils data provided for a future <br />drainfield site indicates mottling at a 3.5' depth. This indicates <br />that the replacement system, should it ever be necessary, would <br />probably have to be a mound. Percolation rates averaged 56 mpi. <br />It would alto be advisable to locate the existing system to ensure <br />it is within the new lot boundaries. <br />B. Discussion of Mound Systems <br />Since the proposed Ringer subdivision appears to need mound systems <br />throughout, it might be worthwhile to review the conditions which <br />favor use of mound systems over conventional trench systems. <br />As you are aware, a biomat norms at the rock -soil interface in a <br />standard trench system. This biomat acts as a "valve" to slow <br />the downward percolation of septic tank effluent to a rate where <br />the flaw is unsaturated, i.e. air in the soil pores is in contact <br />with -che percolating effluent. Under these essential conditions, <br />adequate sewage treatment will occur. However, in many soils, <br />either a seasonal saturated condition or extremely fine, impermeable <br />soil texture (or both) tends to eliminate the air/effluent contact <br />and also severely limits the soils capacity to absorb large amounts <br />of effluent. To ensure that a standard trench system is not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.