Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 13, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />*6. #06 -3169 CHRISTOPHER DIESEN, 1100 TOWNLINE ROAD-PRELIM]NARY PLAT- <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5435 <br />Murphy moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5435, a Resolution Granting <br />Preliminary Approval of a Class III Subdivision for Property Located at 1100 Townline Road. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />7. #06-3173 CITY OF ORONO-ORDINANCE AMENDMENT: INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT <br />ZONING STANDARDS <br />Sansevere inquired whether Mr. Johnson had any comments or concerns with the revisions. <br />Johnson stated the sound barrier in his opinion is a little overkill. Johnson noted they do not have any <br />plans for erecting any signs facing south but questioned whether that would be ineffective or accomplish <br />anything. Johnson stated they would like to see this amendment completed one way or another and that <br />their main issues have been addressed. <br />McMillan stated after reading the memo from Steve Grittman, she is fine with the reconunendations <br />regarding retail. <br />White stated he is also fine with the retail. White inquired about the signage facing south. <br />Murphy stated he has received more than one comment from the people who live across that area since <br />the cover is gone, but that the comments were not directed at Morrie's. Murphy stated the concern raised <br />had to do with the lights . <br />Johnson stated they are ready to see the ordinance adopted. <br />Greg White, VCI Capital, stated he was not present at the last Council meeting, but that he believes most <br />of the proposed revisions are appropriate and desirable. White stated Section 78-826, which relates to the <br />building design and architectural standards, is, in their opinion, not appropriate for an industrial park. <br />White stated that section imposes a higher standard of construction than other adjoining districts across <br />the street, as an example, and that the language seems to be quite subjective. White stated they do not <br />believe that the proposed revisions, particularly in that section, reflect the reality of what the industrial <br />park is . White noted the industrial park consists of 44 acres, with 11 acres still buildable. White noted <br />only a small percentage of the industrial park would be impacted by the higher costs and would not be <br />consistent with the other buildings located within the industrial park. White stated the higher quality <br />construction would also need to attract a higher paying tenant and that he does not feel it is possible to <br />attract that type of tenant. <br />Greg White suggested as an alternati v e that the design requirements for the industrial district not be more <br />stringent than what currently exists. White noted he has put his comments into written form . <br />Acting Mayor White inquired whether the concern deals with less massing in the commercial district <br />than an industrial district. <br />Gaffron stated the City 's existing B districts do not have much in the way of standards and that the same <br />kind of upgrades could be done to the other dishicts . Gaffron stated in the early discussions w ith the <br />City's consultant there \Vas a question on whether the City was going to go with performance standards <br />PAGE 21 of27