Laserfiche WebLink
should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br />Hardship Analysis <br />FILE#06-3182 <br />16 March 2006 <br />Page 5 of 5 <br />In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in <br />the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances <br />from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause <br />undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and <br />shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the <br />spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br />Staff finds that with respect to the lot area and lot width variance requests as the area and <br />width are significantly substandard there are hardships inherent to the land to justify <br />granting these variances. Similarly with the lake setback and hardcover variance <br />requests, there is not a reasonable buildable area in which to build a home with a <br />conforming hardcover level and lake setback. However, the applicant has proposed two <br />decks (one street-side and one larger one on the lake side) which account for a total of <br />308 s.f. of hardcover on the property. While staff does not necessarily feel that a deck is <br />an inappropriate request, there may be justification to scale down or reduce the lakeside <br />deck as proposed. Additionally, the City Engineer has reviewed the floodplain mitigation <br />plan and has deemed it acceptable. Staff supports the conditional use permit for land <br />alterations within the floodplain. As land alterations are proposed within the floodplain, <br />the applicant must seek the necessary approvals from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed <br />District. <br />Issues for Consideration <br />Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the lot width, lot area, lake setback and some <br />level of hardcover variances in conjunction with the redevelopment of this property. The <br />applicant must receive approvals from the MCWD for the work below the 931.5' <br />elevation. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for grading and fill <br />within the floodplain incorporating the recommendations of the MCWD and the City <br />Engineer. <br />5