Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Date Application Received: 02-22-06 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03-02-06 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05-02-06 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: April 4, 2006 Item No. Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: Name: Melanie Curtis iv\ V Title: City Planner Item Description: #06-3182, Jeff Mikkelson-1436 Baldur Park Rd-Variances Zoning District: Lot Area: Lot Width: List of Exhibits: Exhibit A - Exhibit B - Exhibit C - Exhibit D - LR-1 C, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, ½ acre & 100' width 0.19 acre (8,179 s.f.) 51' @OHWL & 55' @75' setback Revised plan based on PC recommendation Applicant's alternate plan PC Action Notice dated 03-22-06 PC Memo & Exhibits of 03-16-06 Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct a new single family residence. The variances consist of lot area and lot width variances for a lot 0.19 acre in area and 51 '-55' in width where 100' is normally required, and 0-75' hardcover variance to allow 987 s.f. or 24.39% hardcover where 0% is normally allowed and 75'-250' hardcover variance to allow 1,494 s.f. or 36.16% hardcover where 25% is normally allowed. A conditional use permit is also required in order to conduct land alterations below the 931.5' 100-year floodplain elevation. The applicant has submitted a revised plan at the request of the Planning Commission and has also submitted an "alternate" plan based on discussions with the neighbor to the south. The alternate plan shows the home shifted 7' closer to the lake in order to put the home in line with each of the neighboring homes and the deck in line with those decks. Planning Commission Recommendation On March 20, 2006, Planning Commission voted 5 -1 to recommend approval of the variances as requested provided the applicant reduce the street side deck to 35 s.f.. The dissenting Commissioner felt that further reductions could be made. Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff does not recommend that the "alternate" plan be considered as the result is a further encroachment toward the lake. Staff recommends approval of the variances consistent with the Planning Commission's recommendation. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Direct staff to draft a Resolution reflecting Council's decision.