My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5083
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5000 - 5099 (June 23, 2003 - January 12, 2004)
>
Resolution 5083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 12:42:08 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 12:42:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ' ,, _ <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> • � � CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� , ;-. �., <br /> ti <br /> ��� �G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �kESH.Og' NO. e�O � � <br /> . The property is located in the LR — 1B zoning district, which requires a <br /> minimum lot size of 1 acre. The subject property is 0.75 acres. <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> . held on November 17, 2003 and recommended approval of the front yard <br /> setback variance based on the followi.n�findings: . <br /> a. The nature of the existing 4/12 pitched roof causes snow loading <br /> problems, <br /> b. A new 7/12 pitched roof would allow snow to slide off the roof with <br /> greater ease, <br /> c. The steeper roof creates the need for a covered entry to minimize icy <br /> conditions and create a safer entrance. <br /> d. The existing front yard setback is non-confornung. <br /> • e. The total ri ht-of-wa on Pheasant Road is excessive at 60 feet. <br /> g Y <br /> f. There will be no negative visual impacts from the road. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> � comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> vaziance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. � <br /> 5. The City.,Council finds that the conditions existing on this property aze <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> district; that granting the variance «�ould not adversely affect traff c <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. � <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.