Laserfiche WebLink
Date Application Received: 1/17 /07 <br />Date Application Complete: 3/12/07 <br />Extended Review Period Expiration: 8/31/07 <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Evelyn Turner <br />Title: City Planner e.-r <br />Item Description: <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Administrator Approval: <br />#07-3266 Vogue ICF Homes, 1404 Baldur Park Road <br />Date: July 23, 2007 <br />Item No. <br />Agenda Section: <br />-Lot Width, Lot Area, Floodplain and Hardcover Variances <br />Zoning District: LR-IC (0.5 acre) <br />Lot Area: 0.28 acre <br />Lot Width: 49.75 feet <br />List of Exhibits: <br />A. CC Minutes of June 11, 2007 <br />B. CC Minutes of May 14, 2007 <br />C. Drawings of proposed house, submitted July 16, 2007 <br />D. Summary of Permitted Hardcover and Structural Coverage for Baldur Park Road, prepared by <br />Staff <br />E. Revised survey/grading plan, submitted June 25, 2007 <br />F. City Engineer's Report dated July3, 2007 <br />G. PC Action Notice dated April 17, 2007 <br />H. PC Memo & Exhibits of April 16, 2007 <br />I. PC Minutes of March 19, 2007 <br />J. PC Minutes of April 16, 2007 <br />Application Summary: Applicant requests the following variances to construct a new house: A lot <br />area of 0.28 acre when 0.5 acre is required; a lot width of 49.75 feet when 100 feet is required, <br />16.07% hardcover in the south 0-75 foot zone when none is allowed and 43.68% hardcover in the 75- <br />150 foot zone when 25% is allowed. To not maintain an elevation of931.5 for 15 feet from the <br />perimeter of the house. <br />Background <br />Council tabled this application on July 9 to allow the house to be redesigned to comply with the <br />defined height requirement. (The minutes are in this packet.) The Applicant has submitted a revised <br />house design that complies with the height requirement (Exhibit C). <br />The Council requested a summary of hardcover and structural coverage for the 17 properties on <br />Baldur Park Road. The summary is attached as Exhibit G. Because there were inconsistencies in <br />accounting for the second ( street side) 0-75 foot zone on some of the properties this second 0 to 7 5 <br />foot zone has been combined with the 75 to 250 foot zone to allow an equitable comparison. The