Laserfiche WebLink
G <br />MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JUNE 20, 1988 <br />#1278 TIMM CONTINUED <br />Gaffron explained the request for an average lakeshore <br />setback variance and a 75-250' hardcover variance to <br />construct a deck. He reviewed staff's recommendation <br />for removal of hardcover to reduce the 75-250' hardcover <br />to 38.2% from the existing 43.9% and proposed 46.nt. <br />Mr. Timm stated he had a plan that would reduce the 75- <br />250' hardcover to 36%. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to <br />recommend approval per staff's recommendation of <br />hardcover removal to 38.2% final 75-250' hardcove_ . <br />Motion, Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />i <br />#1280 .: NSNCY L. "IRE <br />6 BALDUR PART( ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />SDCOND RSVINW <br />Wendy Weihe and her architect, Paul Nielsen, were <br />present for this matter. <br />Mr. Nielsen reviewed the revised plan which reduces the <br />structural hardcover. He referred to Exhibit J and the <br />variance granted at 1432 Baldur Park Road in 1988. <br />Kelle, noted that the revised plan consists of a net <br />reduction of hardcover, of which approximately 91 s.f. <br />is structural hardcover. He found no problem with the <br />hardcover proposed in the revised plan. <br />Regarding the easement issue, Gaffron noted that <br />neither of the two documents on the property's <br />Certificate of Title have a si.;- i f icant effect on this <br />application, but may have a s. ,nificant. effect in the <br />future do!velopment of prope- ties to the north of <br />applicants property. <br />Mr. Franklin submitted a copy c.f his warranty deed to <br />Planning Commission to make here aware of the 45' <br />easement for roadway purposes w ch wi11 greatly reduce <br />applice. t's green area when hip operty is developed. <br />Mr. den Hoag stated he had a *great in the lots on <br />the point and felt that beca of the lack of facts <br />known by the City, the City st ! be very careful and <br />not grant rights and variance applicant without the <br />facts being resolved. <br />