My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1376 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0005
>
Land Use
>
88-1280, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2025 9:35:23 AM
Creation date
9/18/2025 9:31:52 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3- <br />Tat Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Planning Commission Meinbern <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />jr t Michael Gaffron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />DATE Junp 15, 1988 <br />SOWS i1280 Wendy Weihe, 1376 Baldur Park Road - Variances - <br />Second Review <br />List of tshibits - <br />A - Revised Floor Plans/Site Plan <br />B - Revised Exhibit F-5-A (Detailed Hardcover C'alc, Reviried Proposal) <br />C - Easement Documents Provided by Applicant's Attorney <br />D - Mewo i Exhibits of June 2, 1988 <br />Dismesion - <br />At your last meeting, Planning Commission tabled this application, <br />advising applicant to revise the proposal to decrease structural hardcover <br />and overall hardcover on the property. In addition, staff was directed to <br />review the easement situation on the proF'�rty. <br />Application has provided a revised plan showing a decrease in the size <br />of the proposed addition, and somewhat revising the deck configur `_ion. <br />The variance for garage to house setback is no longer necessary. <br />I will review the two issues of easements and hardcover separately: <br />A. tardcover <br />The applicant has revised hardcover percentages downward by eliminating a <br />portion of the addition between t!te house and the garage, which is <br />virtually all in the 75-250' setback zone. They have also reduced the deck <br />nearest the lake to be 8' instead of 11' out from the house. However, this <br />results only in a hardcover decrease of 6 s.f. from the first proposal, in <br />the 0-75' zone. <br />In reviewing the applicants revised proposal and going over hardcover <br />numbers again, staff noted that the figures and percentages in the first <br />proposal were probably slightly incorrect. Those have been corrected (I <br />think) ane the new revised proposal added, yielding the following tables <br />Total <br />Original <br />Corrected <br />Hardcover <br />lot <br />1st Revised <br />Existing <br />Proposed <br />Proposal Pro <br />Allowed <br />it01 <br />()282 s.f.) <br />(3244 s.f. ) <br />(3248 s.f.) (3242 s.f.) <br />(0) <br />75-250' 49.0% 46.6% 44.4% 38.9% 25% <br />(1296 s.f.) (1234 s.f.) (1177 s.t.; (1032 s.f.) (663 s.f.) <br />As you can see, in the 0-75', there r- only a minor decrease in <br />hardcover proposed, about 40 a.f. frog the erx-stinq. In the 0-75' and 75- <br />54' amine, tbo total hardcover to reduced ray shout 266 s.f. from the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.