Laserfiche WebLink
To: File #1280, 1376 Baldur Park Road <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning 6 Zoning Administrator <br />Date: June 13, 1988 <br />Subject: Easements <br />Wendy Weihe's attorney has provided two documents which appear to be filled <br />in the chain of title of the subject property. The first of those <br />documents is Document #2513998 which is a document that transfers property <br />from Arnold Boxrud and Mabel Boxrud to John and ? Ferrin, and at the <br />same time reserves an easement for driveway purposes over a portion of the <br />property. Boxrud, the grantor, transfers Lot 20 and a portion of Lot 21 to <br />Ferrin. In addition, Boxrud reserves an easement for driveway purposes <br />over a portion described by a four-sided tigure as has been described <br />previously. <br />This easement Is subject to interpretation, because it does not descr: oe <br />the property which is benefitted by the easement, only two persons who are <br />presumably benefitted by it. It does no* indicate what properties the <br />Boxruds owned prior to their transfer to Ferrin, hence it is questionable <br />just what properties have the right for driveway purposes over the easement <br />in Lot 20. <br />They other. Document #144094-L is not an easement document at all but is a <br />copy of a mortgage agreement which decribes Lot 30, Block l of Baldur Park <br />as security for a mortgage loan. The description for Lot �0, Block 1 in <br />this mortgage includes an easement over Lot 31 for a septic system and <br />includes a non-exclusive easement for driveway purposes over a strip of <br />land 12' in width, with a description that places that easement partially <br />within Lot 20. However, according to applicant's attorney Daniel Tyson, <br />there is no easement document itself filed against 1376 Baldur Park Road, <br />hence the purported easement described in the mortgage may in fact have <br />never been legally granted, and may not legally exist. <br />It would appear then that there are potentially two easements for "driveway <br />purposes" over Lot 20, and the validity of those two easements has yet to <br />be determined. The descriptions of the two purported easements are not <br />concurrent, and neither easement appears to coincide directly with the two <br />representations of the existing gravel road presentee: by Gron berg 6 Brown. <br />Lacking additional information, staff would suggest that these easements <br />will certainly have an affect. on development of Baldur Park Point. <br />However, for purposes of determining lot area for use in hardcover <br />calculations, the easements that may exist are considered as driveway <br />easements, not private road or public road easements. <br />