My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
78-386 Submittal
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baker Park Reserve
>
Baker Park Reserve - 30-118-23-41-0011
>
Land Use
>
78-386, VAC
>
78-386 Submittal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/18/2025 9:11:29 AM
Creation date
9/18/2025 9:10:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Planning Commission #386 <br />FROM: Alan P. Olson, Village Planner <br />DATE: May 15, 1978 <br />SUBJECT: Hennepin County Park Reserve District <br />Request to Vacate a Platted Road <br />The Park Reserve District, as per the attached letter, has <br />requested the City to vacate a portion of a platted undeveloped <br />road lying entirely within the boundaries of Baker Park Reserve:, <br />The Planning Commission should schedule a Public Hearing for <br />June 26, 1978. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - JUNE 26, 1978 <br />Public Hearing held. Tim Marr represented the Hennepin County Park <br />Reserve District and explained the request. Neighbor of 1195 Starkey <br />Road, Mr. Laidlaw, was present to review the proposal. He had several <br />comments concerning the proposed bike/hike trail location but said he <br />had no objection to the subject vacation. The location of a gate into <br />the park was discussed with comment made that gate next to Laidlaw's <br />property would be less desireable than one further inside park property. <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of vacation finding a public <br />benefit in single ownership and maintenance responsibilities subject <br />to park reserve providing private easement for existing utility lines. <br />Vote: Ayes (4), Nays (0), Abstention (1) McDonald. McDonald didn't <br />see the public benefit of the road vacation and possible moving of gate <br />to park boundary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.