Laserfiche WebLink
Ohl', Hin,,••r Sijhdivision <br />1'ay(- 4 <br />Lot 2, Block 1 <br />Peres PH21 thru PB26. Borings BB21 thru BD23. Average perc rates <br />for bDth Frimzry and alternate sites are acceptable. Slopeq are <br />nearly level at the tested sites, ranging from 0 to 3%. Mottling <br />indicated below 2', with actual water table at 3.2 to 4.21. A <br />standard mound system should be used due to the presence of shallow <br />saturation zones. <br />Lot 3, Block 1 <br />Peres PB31 thru P1326. Borings B031 thru BB33. Slopes in the <br />primary site are approximately 6-8%, on a slight flattening <br />Of the 10-121 slopes surrounding it. Borings in the primary site <br />indicate 1 to 2 ' of loamy topsoil over a 6" layer of organic clay <br />topsoil over a plastic sandy clay. Actual water table at the <br />primary site was below 51. However, the high plasticity indicates <br />a heavy clay that is probably saturated. The secondary site was <br />mottled below 1.5 feet with an actual saturated zone at 1' depth. <br />Coupled with a slope of 10% the secondary site is marginal for a <br />mound system and would require at least 2' of sand base as part <br />of the design. I suggest that a standardpre3sure mound system <br />be required for both sites with added sand depth for the secondary <br />system. Please note that this lot is the most tenuous in the <br />subdivision in turms of slope and soils consideration for using <br />a mound system. Should a proposed house location encroach on <br />either of the tested sites, careful review and possible additional <br />testing will be ncedel to ensure that a mound can still be used. <br />The site does nog appear capable of supporting any kind of a trench <br />system. <br />/A,u t 4, Block 1 <br />,/ <br />Ileres PD41 thru PUIG. 13crings 7J841 thru U1343. :;lopes average 514 - <br />71 overall. Lo_i.ngr. indicate actual'water table at 4' with mottling <br />at a depth of 3-4' for the primary and 2' at the secondary site. <br />Pere rates wore fairly uniform throughout those tcc;ted sites. A <br />depres3ion/drainageway to the imi-iiediate south of the tested sites <br />must be avoided during construction of the systems. I would ` <br />recommend a ~standard pressure mound for both sites. <br />Lot 5, Block 1 <br />Pere; P1351 thru 11D5G. Lorincjs LD51 thru L1353. :lopco arc 31 to <br />63 overall. Mottling aL Liao primary site :started at 2.7 to 3.5' <br />with actual water table at 3.7 to 5.0' . This; site is; ac.cepcat)le <br />for a standard mound sy:,t--;m. The alt-crnate site has a f.('.rc rate <br />cunGidered too slog for any sysLc.rn by code. do:jevcr, close <br />scrutiny shows that the peres were tat -on at lepth in the sandy <br />clay subsoil, not in the L opsoil. In c1cneral, throughout the entire <br />subdivision tho tcstinrl done at a depth of 12", in the tripsoil, <br />indicates acceptable percolation rates, with tcstincf at 24" or more <br />indicating slower, marginal perc rates. In my 01)inion, this site <br />is no different than must of the others, and would have an acceptable <br />Lore rate if tested at the 12" depth in the :randy loam top:;oil. <br />No further 'te:t;tincj shuu1,1 b(( rr-rluirorl; a mound-.yr;tc.rn if; recc)mrnended. <br />