My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5068
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5000 - 5099 (June 23, 2003 - January 12, 2004)
>
Resolution 5068
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 12:37:43 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 12:37:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� �� <br /> O 4 � <br /> � �� � ; � CITY of ORONO <br /> � , ti <br /> ��� � �G'�' . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> `�kESI30g' NO. Jr O s � <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed t�is application at a public hearing <br /> held on October 20, 2003 and recor�mended approval of the average <br /> lakeshore setback and lot area variances based on the following findings: . <br /> a. The lot is situated on a point�zhich causes the entire lot to sit in front <br /> of the average lakeshore setback. <br /> b. The lot is a legal lot of record and �ias granted legal buildable status in <br /> 1983 as Record Lot ti'o. 13. The lot is 2.9 acres in size located in a 5 <br /> acre zoning district. <br /> c. A structure has existed on the lot in the past. <br /> d. A structure could not be constructed on the lot without an average <br /> lakeshore setback and lot area�•ariance. <br /> • e. A structure can be built on the lot meeting all other pertinent code <br /> requirements. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> � and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the agplicants and the puDlic, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and�relfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning• <br /> district; that granting the variance �z-ould not adversely affect traffic <br /> conditions, light, air nor pose a fire haz3rd or other danger to neighboring <br /> property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable h�rdship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> preserve a substantial property riQht of the applicants; and «-ould be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive <br /> Plan of the City. <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.