My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 9/12/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 9/12/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:49 AM
Creation date
9/16/2025 1:34:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
9/12/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/16/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: <br />Planning <br />Commission <br />Members <br />EX#. <br />P <br />From: <br />Michael <br />P. Gaffron, <br />Assistant <br />Zoning Administrator <br />d_ <br />A-1q-9 7 <br />Date: February 6, 1986 <br />Subject: #990 Ward Ferrell 3405-3411-3415 Wate-town Road - <br />Variances - Update to Memo of November 13, 1985 <br />List ct Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Memo of 11/13/85 With Exhibits <br />Exhibit B - Survey of Property With Existing House <br />Exhibit C - Soils Report, Site Plan For Existing House <br />Exhibit D - Planning Commission Minutes 11/18/85 <br />EXK. E- Corv.ODoaArF s#T+F AcAAu <br />Mr. Ferrell has now submitted the additional survey and <br />soils report to show an alternate drain`ield site for the <br />existing house. Given no future encroachments, there is adequate <br />area on the lot with the existing house to replace the septic <br />system with a fully conforming system. <br />Please review the memo of 11/13/85. As noted in that memo <br />and considering the additional information submitted, it appears <br />technically possible to place a house, garage, driveway, well, <br />and primary and alternate septic systems on each of the lots. <br />The possible house location would be somewhat- limited by the <br />drainfield sites. There would be potential conflicts if a <br />situation occurred where an extremely large house, pool, tennis <br />court, etc. were proposed. The properties lend themselves to <br />relatively low levels of development. <br />Finally, from a zoning code standpoint, even if only one new <br />building site is granted, this is precedent se'.ing. In the <br />past, Cot ,cil and Planning Commission have generally held the <br />line in similar unsewered common ownership :situations. Approval <br />of 1 or 2 new building sites might have long-term impact on <br />Oronn's effectiveness in avci.ding se% weigh this Linst the <br />applicant's real and preceived rights as a pruperty o. . and the <br />history of zoning code changes over the years. -le there <br />sufficient justifications to grant a variance? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.