Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #990 <br />November 13, 1985 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />The 1974 Zoning Code declared this land to be zoned RR-lB, 2 Acre <br />Single Family Residential. As far as existing lots of record, it stated as <br />follows: <br />31.201. 2aisting Lots. A lot of record existing upon January 1, 1975 <br />(the effective date of the Zoning Code) under single <br />separate ownership in an "R" District, which does not meet the re- <br />quirements of the Zoning Code as to area or width may be utilized for <br />a single family detached dwelling purpose provided that in the judg- <br />ment of the Coundil such use does not adversely affect public health <br />or safety and the following requirements are met: <br />31.203. In "R" districts of Greater Than One Acre. A lot of record <br />in any "R" District in the City in excess of one acre, which does not <br />meet the requirements of this Zoning Code as to area or width only, <br />may be utilized for single family detached dwelling purposes if the <br />Council finds: <br />(1) it is at least one acre in size, and the average width of <br />ti-a lot is at least 100 feet; and <br />(2) it is either served by public sanitary sewer or meets all <br />the septic system requirements of the City or other governmental <br />body; and <br />(3) it otherwise mets the requirements of this or other <br />applicable ordinances. <br />Under the 1974 Code, the Council at their option could have granted a <br />lot area variance for a lot of single separate ownership, but the Code <br />again did not specifically discuss the standards for the separation of <br />commonly owned lots. The general City policy, as evidenced by the outcome <br />of at least one typical zoning application in 1981 was that unsewered <br />adjacent lets owned in common could not be c, iQ red buildable and could <br />not be separated unless each resulting lot of ..,mb.'nation of lots included <br />the required acreage in that zoning district, <br />Upon recodification in 1984 the Zoning Code was amended to include the <br />following Section 10.03, Subdivision 6 (C): <br />C. The separation by the transfer or sale of non -conforming, un- <br />developed lots not served by public s-nitary sewer, aligner in a <br />contiguous arrangement, undivided by - rablic or private road or road <br />easement and under same or common ownership is not permitted without <br />Council approval. Council approval is not required if the separation <br />of such lots results in individual Building sites that satisfy the <br />area and width requirements of the Zoning Chapter. <br />