Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1316 <br />August 8, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />Staff would recommend the following course of action to the Planning <br />Commission: <br />1. Regardless of what structure is ultimately approved, hardcover <br />should not increase above the existing 29.9% as shown in the staff <br />hardcover review. <br />2. Maintain the 10' required setback from the r--- lot line. <br />3. Maintain the 10' required setback from t. ..se and existing <br />detached garage, unless a reasonable hardship is mown to allow that <br />setback to decrease. <br />4. Unless a substantial hardship can be shown, applicant should cut <br />down the total floor area of the structure to meet the required 1,000 <br />s.f. maximum floor area standard. <br />5. Staff would strongly recommend that alternative sites within the <br />property be considered for construction of this garage to minimize its <br />impact on the property; for instance, placing the additional. garage <br />west of the existing garage, to minimiz3 the need for steep driveway <br />and its added hardcover (see Exhibit I). <br />Finally, I would note tliat the property owner has not signed the <br />application and should do so at his earliest convenience. <br />2._ ) <br />1 <br />