Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF RECONNENDATION : <br />Absent any revised information from the applicant, staff would concur <br />with the Planning Commission recommendation. In the memo to the Planning <br />Commission, staff suggested that if Planning Commission wished to approve <br />some proposal for the site, the following criteria would be appropriate: <br />1. <br />No increase <br />above the <br />existing 29.9% hardcover (75-2501). <br />2. <br />Maintain 10' <br />required <br />rear lot -line setback. <br />3. <br />Maintain 10' <br />required <br />setback from the house and existing detached <br />garage unless a <br />hardship <br />is shown. <br />4. <br />Reduce size <br />to meet 1,J00 <br />s.f. maximum floor area requirement. <br />5. <br />Applicant should <br />be <br />urged to revise his proposal to reduce the <br />impact of the structure on the property. <br />If the applicant or his agent brings a revised proposal to the Council <br />meeting, Council has the option to review that proposal and take what ever <br />action may be approporiate, or Council may wish to refer that proposal to <br />the Planning Commission. If referral to the Planning Commission does <br />occur, it would be reviewed at the October 3rd meeting. If no further <br />proposal is forthcoming and Council takes action on the current proposal, a <br />resolution reflecting that action will be presented to Council at your next <br />meeting. <br />