My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 9/12/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 9/12/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:49 AM
Creation date
9/16/2025 1:34:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
9/12/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/16/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #990 <br />September 8, 1988 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />Action to Date on this Application -- <br />To date, staff has provided Council with 8 memos (with associated <br />exhibits) for this application. The item has been reviewed at 3 Planning <br />Commission meetings and has been an agenda item at 9 Council meetings, <br />dating back to April 1985. During discussions at the April 14, 1986 <br />Council meeting, Mayor Butler noted that she would be open to allowing 1 <br />additional home, but not 2. It is unclear from the minutes whether other <br />Council Members snared that sentiment. Mr. Ferrell, at that time, did not <br />wish to revise his application. However, due to the continued tablings at <br />the applicant's request, the Council never has formally adopted a <br />resolution denying variances for each of the vacant 1 acre lots. <br />It is staff's interpretation of Farrell's current letter of request <br />that he wishes to build on 1 of the vacant 1 acre lots without doing a lot <br />line rearrangement. <br />Pertinent Factors - <br />1. Ferrell has provided septic testing for each vacant lot which <br />shows that, under strictly limited building proposals, a modest house <br />with septic system and alternate site could conceivably be constructed <br />on each lot. However, future additions or additional amenities that <br />might be proposed for those lots would be severely restricted, and the <br />City would still have to be concerned with the greater density of <br />septic systems and residences in the area. <br />2. If the Council is of a mind to allow 1 additional house on the 3 <br />acre property, staff would recommend an approximately even split of <br />1.5 acres + with each property. This we ld require a lot line <br />rearrangement and subsequent combination. Staff would not be in favor <br />of Ferre l l's suggestion to approve 1 of the 1 acre lots and deny the <br />other, because that leaves the door open for a future Council to <br />create a more dense situation, and still. would leave severe <br />restrictions on the 1 acre lot to be built on. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.