Laserfiche WebLink
81688.1 <br />AUG 2219'3 <br />TO: Mayor and City Council <br />FROM: Mark E. Bernhardson; City Administrato.�--� <br />DATE: August 15, 1988 <br />SUBJECT: Replacement of Current Copier <br />Attachments: A. Replacement of Copy Machine Memo Dated 8/15/88 <br />B. Excerpt - League of Minnesota Handbook <br />ISSUE <br />1. Determinaticn of wnether the City enters into a lcng-term <br />lease for a new machine or chooses to purchase. <br />2. Selection of machine for lease or purchase. <br />I_NTRO_DUCT_ION - As noted the City is at the point of replacement <br />of -its -present leased copier and can purchase one with greater <br />speed for substantially less dollars. <br />DISCUSSION - While the bulk of the discussion is in Attachment A <br />it should be noted that the City is able to select the machine <br />which gives it the best features for the money, as these are <br />simply quotations. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Issue I. Purchase <br />1. Purchase <br />2. Undertake a .:-,w machine lease <br />3. Month to month rental (at a substantial price above <br />leasing.) <br />4. Table with a month to month rental until resolved. <br />Issue 2. Machine Type <br />1. Recommendation <br />2.-anasonic <br />3. Other <br />4. Table <br />RECOMMENDATION - As the Savin permits greater operation ease when <br />it comes to copying as far as ease of paper sizes, copy speed and <br />security access over the Panasonic for a similar copy price, it <br />is the one recommended. (The monthly cost of purchasing the <br />Savir. is $15/mo more than the Panasonic over 60 months but is <br />felt that the additional features will be worth the additional <br />expense. The amortization assume:, no sa 1 va, e value for the <br />machine at the end of 60 months.) <br />PROPOSED MOTION - Moved by !_, seconded by to amend the 1988 <br />1 <br />