My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
08-08-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:02 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 9:36:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
8/8/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/15/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To: Mayor Grabek & OrCouncil Members ".O y OF Okdft <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date: August 2, 1988 <br />Subject: #1286 Gary Roderick Construction, Inc., 1749 North Farm Road - <br />Variance <br />Application - Requesting a variance to allow a 6' hilh fence along the side <br />lot lire adjacent to County Road 6. <br />Zoninq District - LR-lA, single family lakeshore residential, 2 acres, <br />unsewered <br />Li ;t of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A - Planning Commission Action Notice 7/22/88 <br />Exhibit B - Memo & Exhibits of 5/27/88 <br />Discussion - <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of May 27, 1988. The applicant <br />wishes to construct a 6' high privacy fence along County Road 6, adjacent <br />to the house which he has constructed and has for sale. The applicant <br />suggests that a 6' high fence is necessary to screen the property from <br />traffic noise and headlights, and to keep young children from running out <br />onto the County road. <br />Planning Commission initially reviewed this item very :)rief ly at their <br />June 6th meeting, and although the applicant_ was not present, voted to <br />recommend denial. At the applicant's request, the item was re -scheduled <br />before the Planning Commission when applicant could be present, on July 18, <br />1988. At that meeting, Planning Commission listened to the applicant and <br />the comments of neighboring property owners, all of whom expressed that <br />they felt that such a fence would not be in character with their <br />neighborhood. Planning Commission :i-iefly discussed what alternatives the <br />applicant might have, and then on a -0 vote recommended denial of the 6' <br />high fence. <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />In keeping with the Planning -,-...nmission recommendation, staff would <br />rpconamend that the Iroposed 6' high fence be denied. Additionally, staff <br />would ask the Council to consider -i*.--ther certain elements of subdivision <br />desiqn should be included in develrq-.-•nts such as this adjacent to a 60 mph <br />highway. The use of berming and re--., red natur6: screening come to mind. <br />Staff will draft a resolution ed on Counci l's direction, for your <br />next meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.