My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 8/8/1988
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
Agenda Packet Cc - regular meeting 8/8/1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2025 10:14:49 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 9:36:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet CC
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
8/8/1988
Retention Effective Date
9/15/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JULY 11, 1988 <br />based upon that information. He does not believe that he could <br />add anything further to the issues being discussed by each <br />candidate. <br />Mayor Grabek asked candidate how long he had lived in Orono - he <br />replied less than two years. Mayor asked him ghat things have <br />disappointed him since he moved to Orono. Vongries replied <br />that basically he feels that Navarre has a lot to offer. He does <br />not like the fact that many citizens seem to have a disinterest in <br />maintaining their properties in an aztracti,le state. He is sure <br />that there will be pressures on the Communi from Minneapolis and <br />that the Council should endeavor to maintain the kind of standards <br />Orono now has. He feels the number of boats per property on the <br />lake should be given more attention, as should the issues of drug <br />abuse and AIDS that are national issues that should be given local <br />attention. He mentioned that Orono is #5 for taxes in the State <br />and would like to see more attention paid to containing taxes. <br />Mayor Grabek asked for any more questions of Dr. Vongries and <br />stated that he had quite a distinguished past and a tremendous <br />amount to offer his Community and the Council. <br />Mayor Grabek stated that he was very impressed with the candidates <br />and their enthusiasm. It is a shame that they cannot have a <br />council with 8 more people. He personally would like to take some <br />additional time and consider all of the candiaat.es' applications. <br />He asked the Council if they would agree to take time to examine <br />the candidates and give those not present an opportunity ::o meet <br />and be heard and make the decision at the next Council meeting. <br />Councilmember Goetten concurred with the Mayor's comment. She <br />stated that she was really impressed with all that was said and <br />what each candidate would have to offer. She has not seen such an <br />array of candidates. Motion by Mayor Grabek, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten to table appointment until July 25, 1988. <br />Callahan felt that the qualifications and people applying were <br />outstanding. Agrees that more time should be taken to determine <br />appointment. Motion, Ayes-4, Nays-0, Motion passes. <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />BOHN'S POINT ROAD - FEASIBILITY STUDY - RESOLUTION #2469 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this had originally <br />been presented back at the first Council Meeting in June. At tha* <br />time Council had stated on a 4-0 vote that they did not want to <br />have the feasibility study co^sidered. In discussions with one or <br />two of the Counci lmembers they felt that they did not understand <br />the split between the public portion of the private portion and <br />the interest on behalf of the people on the public to have the <br />stud_ done. Due to that confusion, it was aF propriate to bring <br />this matter back for further discussion by Council to see if they <br />do in fact wart to undertake it because of the public portion, <br />which is $2,000.00. The Engineer says it does not make any <br />difference whether they include the Bohn's Point Circle or nct in <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.