My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
09-15-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:18 AM
Creation date
9/12/2025 3:02:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
Packet
Document Date
9/15/2025
Retention Effective Date
9/15/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # LA25-000038 <br />15 September 2025 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The substandard lot <br />size is an existing condition, and there is no available land with which to make the property more <br />conforming. The restricted roadway, lot size and shape, and configuration with the lake on two <br />sides are challenges not created by the owners. There should be consideration for variances for the <br />substandard -sized property. The project has been designed with an effort toward limiting the <br />additional hardcover without sacrificing functionality; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances are requested to <br />permit the construction of a new home on the residential property, which is reasonable. <br />Additionally, City Code Section 6.12.530 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as <br />follows: <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been <br />a factor in the variance approval determination. <br />5. Practical difficulties also include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy <br />systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. <br />17, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 6.12. This condition is not applicable. <br />6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code <br />Chapter 6.12 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not <br />applicable, as a single-family residence is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. <br />7. The board or council may permit, as a variance, the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family <br />dwelling. This condition is not applicable. <br />8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or <br />immediately adjoining property. The property's substandard size, location, and unique configuration with <br />lakeshore on two sides create significant difficulties that also apply to many of the properties in the same <br />neighborhood. The proposed setbacks and hardcover level are not out of character. <br />9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. <br />Other properties in the neighborhood are similarly impacted by the peninsula configuration and small lot <br />sizes. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br />of the applicant. The proposed size of the home conforms to 20% structural coverage limitations. Granting <br />of the lot area and width, setback, and hardcover variances are necessary for the preservation of the <br />property rights of the owners. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, or morals, or in any <br />other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the variances for lot size, hardcover, and <br />setbacks in this situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to <br />alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Without variances, the property is unbuildable. The variances for lot size, <br />setback, and hardcover are necessary and do not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. <br />The Commission may recommend, or the Council may impose conditions in granting variances. Any conditions <br />imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No <br />variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is <br />located. <br />Public Comments <br />No comments from the public have been received as of the drafting of this report. <br />Analysis <br />The applicant's plan appears to be consistent with the immediate neighborhood, and although it reflects a minimal <br />(0.1%) increase in hardcover overall, it provides a significant hardcover reduction within 75 feet of the lake. Issues for <br />`V, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.