Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION l\ilEETING <br />MINUTES FOR MAY 18, 1998 <br />:,,. ( • • . !'· <br />.. \.d:'.:,. .· -. (#12) . #'2370 GARY O'KEEFE,_ 1392 BALDUR. PA~ ROAD <br />"7\l.· . CONDITIONAL USE.PERivIIT-9:42.;.10:07 P.M. ·. -. . . . <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Applicant was present. <br />-VARIAN CE AND <br />Gaffron reported this is a request for variances for hardcover as well as a variance and conditional <br />use permit for grading within 5' of a lot line for construction of a new residence to replace the <br />existing home on the property.· This is a conforming lot as to lot area, and meets the 80% width <br />standard for the LR-1 C zone. Applicant proposes to tear down the house and garage, and replace <br />it with a house that meets the lakeshore setback and side setbacks. The applicant proposes tci lower <br />the top of the hill, and this requires grading within the 0-75' and 75-250' zones. Grading in the site <br />would r¢sult in fill from the new basement excavation being placed near the road to accommodate <br />a new attached garage. The applicant proposes a walkout which requires excavation in the 0-75' <br />zone. <br />· . Gaffron noted that staff recomm_ends approval of a hardcover-variance, but because of the Joss of <br />· mature trees, it.is difficult to recommend cutting do'Wn the hill. Staff also recommends denial of the <br />excavation to create a walkout based on past City practice and the goals and policies against <br />shoreline topography changes as noted in the Comprehensive Plan. <br />The applicant noted he bought this property with the intent to build a walkout residence. He stated <br />that the neighbors are in favor of cutting do,vn the hill, and this would make a more gradual slope <br />from the lake.· Lindquist asked if the hardcover calculations were done by a surveyor. Applicant <br />replied no but he felt they are accurate. Gaffron noted he only included the -hardcover items sho\vn <br />on the survey. Ha\vn asked if this was a bluff. Gaffron replied it did not meet the criteria to be <br />cons.idered as a bluff. <br />Mrs. O'Keefe said there is a hardship, as they need something on the south side· of the lot to get to <br />the garage, noting the topography of the site: · · ·. · · <br />Lindquist asked for any public comments. There were none. <br />Applicant noted that grading in the 0-75' zone \\ill be necessary to remove the present house, so that <br />excavation to create a walkout would not require much additional ,vork. Gaffron noted that the <br />problem is there will still be a substantial cutting in the 0-75' zone to create a walkout once the <br />present foundation is removed and the site brought back to match existing grades. <br />12