My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#2457 Scanned File
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1392 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0003
>
Land Use
>
99-2457, VAR
>
#2457 Scanned File
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2025 2:29:28 PM
Creation date
9/11/2025 2:26:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 16, 1999 <br />(#8) #2457 DAVID AND PAULA LINDBERG, 1392 BALDUR PARK ROAD, VARJANCES • <br />Continued <br />Julie and Mark VerSteege, neighbors to the north, said they want to make sure the runoff stays on <br />the applicant's property, and does not drain into their basement. <br />· Mabusth asked if the applicants have submitted~{ grading plah. · ·. <br />Van Zomeren said the plan was subhlitted to Tom Kellogg, the City Engineer. He said to make sure <br />silt control fences are used. The City Engineer's first review did not flag any major concerns. <br />Mabusth asked if the surveyor has confirmed that there is no average lakeshore setback problem. <br />Van Zomeren said yes. <br />Hawn asked if the applicants have looked at reducing the structural coverage by 40 square feet. <br />David Lindberg said they are willing to reduce the structural coverage. <br />McMillan questioned the detached garage. <br />Lindberg said an attached garage would require a larger driveway and additional grading. <br />McMillan suggested repositioning the garage in order to reduce the slope and Improve safety. <br />Mabusth questioned why the O'Keefe application was so much lower in hardcover in the 75'-250' <br />setback. <br />Lindberg said the O'Keefe's had more driveway a·nd a smaller garage. <br />Mabusth asked how the other commission members felt about the hardcover in the 75'-250' setback. <br />Hawn said this is a difficult site. She would like to see the structural coverage reduced by 40 square <br />feet. <br />Mabusth asked staff to review the variances that would be needed with the current plan. <br />Van Zomeren said they would need a variance for the 0'-75' setback on the south side, a variance in <br />the 75'-250' setback to allow 33% where 25% is allowed, a conditional use permit for grading within <br />five feet of the property line and restoration of the topography. <br />McMillan asked about the O'Keefe's plan and what the amount of hardcover was in the 75'-250'. <br />Van Zomeren said it was 5,7~5 square feet. . <br />Mabusth asked if the garage design would match the house. <br />Lindberg said the garage would match the house. <br />Mabusth said the Commission would have a problem approving 33% hardcover in the 75'-250' <br />setback. She asked about the hardcover that would result from the porches. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the square footage of the hardcover. She said they would need to reduce <br />1,000 square feet to meet the 25% requirement. <br />Page9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.