My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-3138 Scanned file
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1376 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0005
>
Land Use
>
05-3138, VAR
>
05-3138 Scanned file
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2025 2:05:00 PM
Creation date
9/11/2025 2:03:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RIDER BENNETT, LLP <br />City of Orono <br />July 13, 2005 <br />Page2 <br />I attach a copy of the November 24, 2004 Survey we obtained showing Ms. Benson has <br />installed "hardcover" or boulders and other landscaping within Mr. Puzak's access easement area. <br />We believe Ms. Benson did this in violation of the 2003 Resolution. I attach photographs taken <br />by our surveyor in late 2004 (when he performed the November 24, 2004 survey)-the 1998 date <br />shown on them is incorrect. I witnessed the surveyor taking these photographs. The surveyor <br />marked the boundary of Mr. Puzak's easement with orange cones, and as you can see, Ms. <br />Benson has installed a stone rooster, various landscaping and boulders, a mailbox, and a metal <br />lattice U-shaped structure in the area of the easement adversely affecting Mr. Puzak's use for <br />access. <br />We hereby notify you that we believe Ms. Benson is currently in violation of the zoning <br />code. We object to the variance currently being applied for by Ms. Benson and request a copy of <br />the Survey she supplied to you showing property boundary lines and the access easement's <br />location. We request that the City look at the Survey Ms. Benson provided you and determine <br />whether she has depicted the easement area at all on that survey, or if she did disclose the <br />easement, determine whether the easement area depicted differs from our November 24, 2004 <br />Survey. I wonder if Ms. Benson even disclosed the existence of Mr. Puzak's easement to the <br />City. <br />Ms. Benson may have depicted the area of the driveway currently "in use" on her survey, <br />but that does not show the ACTUAL boundaries of the access easement. Obviously, since Ms. <br />Benson has applied for a variance to enlarge the size of her garage and her home, the location of <br />the easement is of utmost importance and should be carefully considered by the City before a <br />variance can be granted. We respectfully request that any variance consideration be postponed <br />by the City until the easement dispute can be resolved by a court of law, as the location of the <br />easement is in dispute. <br />Please call me if you have any questions or require any additional information. <br />Very truly yours, <br />RIDER BENNETT, LLP <br />vv ~A---By ___ /1 ___ ~_4-______ ~---++----=it iJkier W. Denys <br />JWD <br />Enclosures <br />cc: Fred Puzak (via mail w/ copies of photos) <br />1282290-1 <br />RIDER BENNETT
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.