Laserfiche WebLink
DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST. <br />Home owner is asking to be able to remove the existing garage, and construct a new garage attached to the <br />house. <br />The new garage will have an addition built over that would be a master bedroom , and storage. <br />HARDSHIP DOCUMENTATION FORM. <br />1.) Because of the harsh Minnesota winters, and overall use of the garage, attaching the garage will <br />greatly improve the use, along with improving existing house design. Currently the roof is a hip roof <br />design, and does not match the existing house <br />. We will be matching the roof of the house when building the new garage. <br />2.) Because the property has water on both sides, there is difficulty meeting some ordinances because of <br />set back requirements. <br />3.) If the variance is granted, we feel that the character of the locality would be improved. Both with <br />design and the ability to be able to park on the property. <br />4.) None <br />5.) None <br />6.) None <br />7.) None <br />8.) As noted above this property is unique in that it has water on both sides, thus making it more difficult <br />to comply with ordinances. <br />9.) To my knowledge, there are not any other properties in the area that have the same conditions. <br />10.) To be able to have a attached garage in Minnesota is a must in being able to enjoy the property. Also <br />due to the lack of storage in the house, the addition would create much needed space. <br />11.) The attaching of the garage will benefit the parking issue, and will make the area safer. It will not <br />impair the health, safety, comfort, or morals. <br />12.) We feel that the changes made will do nothing but improve the property, and make it safer. <br />HARDSHIP STATEMENT. <br />The home owner has owned the property for three years, and has done considerable improvements to the <br />interior of the existing structure. She currently has a primary residence in Edina that she will be selling <br />this fall, and will be making this her permanent residence. Because of the unusual conditions associated <br />with the lot, along with the existing structures the way they are now, by granting this variance the overall <br />condition of the property will be improved. <br />In doing the hardcover calculation, the results show an improvement in the 75 -250 zone, and only .3% <br />increase in the 0 • 75 zone. Action to remove some existing retaining walls on the east side of the garage, <br />along with a reduction of approximately 10 feet of an existing side walk, and we will off set the garage <br />door so that we can minimize the hardcover there. By doing these changes the hardcover will reduced to <br />or lowered in comparison to the new hardcover calculation presented by Advanced Survey. <br />We feel that by not increasing the square footage of the new structures we are not creating a change that <br />could be noticed, or objected by the neighbors. <br />We have submitted the acknowledgement forms to the city, and both neighbors were in approval of the <br />changes. <br />We would be grateful in hearing any suggestions from the city in that would improve the chances for <br />approval. <br />Thank you. <br />Dan Larkin <br />DBA Larkin construction. <br />Sandra Benson