My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-3138 Recorded Resolution
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1376 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0005
>
Land Use
>
05-3138, VAR
>
05-3138 Recorded Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2025 2:03:49 PM
Creation date
9/11/2025 2:03:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 5 3 7 ({) <br />2. The property is located in the LR-1 C, One Family Lakeshore Zoning <br />District which requires a minimum lot area of 0.5 acre and a minimum lot <br />width of 100'. <br />3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br />held on July 18, 2005 and on a vote of 6 -1 recommended approval of <br />variances based on the following findings: <br />a. The applicant's property has 12,726 s.f. or 0.29 acre in area and 100' <br />of width at the north shoreline and 56' of width at the northern 75' <br />setback. <br />b. No additional land is available for acquisition by the applicant to make <br />the property conforming in area or width. <br />c. The applicant is proposing to remove an existing detached garage and <br />construct a slightly smaller attached garage with living space above; <br />no additional living space is proposed within the substandard setbacks. <br />d. Due to the hardcover levels and location of the home any additions or <br />alterations to the house and detached garage require variances. <br />e. There is no available land to purchase to make the property <br />conforming. <br />f. The applicant is proposing to remove portions of nonconforming <br />hardcover in conjunction with setback variance approvals. <br />g. The applicant is proposing to reorient the existing driveway on site to <br />allow for parking on the property rather than on the neighboring <br />property and within the easement. The existing layout of the site, and <br />the existing easement providing driveway access to the neighboring <br />properties, are hardships that support the proposed variances. <br />4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br />and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br />comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br />variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br />--------------.. Page2of5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.