Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 15, 2011 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />their property. The lot has lake on both sides and has a very small 75-250 foot zone. Hardcover <br />variances are necessary in order to do as they propose. <br />The applicants have proposed to remove the side-load garage doors and move the doors to the south side <br />for an end-load garage. This will allow them to change the driveway so that they do not need to utilize <br />the neighboring property for access. They are requesting to increa.se hardcover by 127 square feet in the <br />southwest 0-75 foot zone, reduce hardcover by 3 8 square feet in the northeast 0-7 5 foot zone, and <br />increase hardcover by 281 square feet in the 75-250 foot zone for a total increase of 307 square feet. <br />Baldur Park Road as it approaches the applicants' property is approximately 12 feet wide. The applicant <br />is proposing to remove a large blacktop area in front of the garage as it is currently oriented. Some of the <br />blacktop removal is proposed within Puzak's easement, resulting in a 12 foot wide driveway before it <br />widens out on Puzak's own property in this area. Puzak reviewed the proposed plans and expressed <br />concern regarding the proposed hardcover removals within the area ofhis easement and emergency <br />vehicle access to his property. Mr. Puzak has sent a letter to the City outlining his concerns and that letter <br />is included in the Planning Commission packet. Staff discussed the issue with Orono's Police Chief and <br />he has determined that any width in driveway in excess of 12 feet has no additional emergency access <br />benefit. <br />Staff finds due to the current access arrangement and the property's proximity to the lake, practical <br />difficulties exist. The applicants' plan should be reviewed against what is the minimal increase in <br />hardcover necessary to alleviate the practical difficulty ... The proposed configuration of the new driveway <br />as it meets the existing driveway in this location should be reviewed such that maneuverability is not <br />compromised. Staff feels that perhaps the applicants should flare both ends outward to facilitate pulling <br />into and backing out of the new driveway. Additionally, it should be noted that by removing all of the <br />blacktop hardcover as proposed, a sidewalk to the front door from the driveway would be eliminated. <br />Code requires a minimum two foot wide sidewalk. The applicants should revise their plan to address <br />both of these issues. As:part of this application, the applicants should be required to remove any existing <br />sidewalk or hardcover encroachment which extends into the property to the northwest. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of hardcover variances in order to reorient the existing driveway. <br />The applicants should address the need for a sidewalk to the front door, remove encroachments, revise the <br />curb cut of the driveway, and be required to submit an updated survey reflecting the changes prior to City <br />Council review. <br />Thiesse asked if there will be adequate room to turn around in the applicants' driveway. <br />Curtis stated that should be looked at more closely. The requirement for a side load garage is 15 feet <br />from a garage door and it may need to be lengthened somewhat to allow for better maneuverability. <br />Leskinen stated it appears that the end-load garage is cut into the grade and quite a bit of dirt will need to <br />be removed. Leskinen asked where the dirt will be placed and how that will affect the drainage in the <br />area. <br />Curtis indicated there is a retaining wall in the area but that she is not sure where they will be exporting <br />the material. <br />Page <br />13