Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 17, 2003 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />(#4) #03-2875 SANDRA ANN BENSON, 1376 BALD UR PARK ROAD, VARIAN CE <br />7:45-7:55 P.M. <br />Sandra Benson, Applicant, Wes Sampson, the Architect, and Dan Larkin, _the General <br />Contractor, were present. <br />Chaput reported that the applicant was requesting variances to reconstruct and expand the <br />roof of an existing principal structure and replace windows and doors on the second story. <br />The required variances would include principal structure located 25.1' from the OHWL of <br />Lake Minnetonka where 75' is required, a side yard setback of 6.6' with a 1' overhang · <br />encroachment where 10' is required, and a 48.7' encroachment into the average lakeshore <br />setback <br />Chaput explained that neither the footprint of the structure nor the hardcover was proposed <br />to change with the roof expansion. She stated that the applicant proposes to remove a <br />portion of the existing roof of the original structure and replace it with one continuous <br />ridge, approximately 14" higher than the existing roof structure, or 1' 1 O" below the -· <br />roofline attached to the west. The exact height may vary within inches from what is <br />proposed once the structure is worked out. Chaput indicated that the structure was not <br />proposed to be closer to the OHWL than what exists currently. <br />With regard to the structural engineer's report, Chaput reported that the engineer reviewed <br />the proposed roof reconstruction and found that the existing foundation and walls can <br />support the proposed work. The extent of the proposed work includes replacement of <br />some windows, doors and walls on the second story of the house. Chaput indicated that the <br />first story of the structure and other portions of the home will not be modified as a result of <br />this proposal. <br />After reviewing the issues for consideration, Chaput stated th.at staff recommends approval <br />of the requested variances to reconstruct and expand the roof of the existing principal <br />structure with .two conditions mentioned in the memo dated February 25, 2003. <br />Benson commented that they hoped to obtain more living space from the remodel. <br />Chair Smith stated that, in her opinion, the remodel will be more attractive and that she had <br />no difficulty approving the application . <br />Rahn questioned the need for further screening , since the elevation change was so minor <br />to cause the need for more screening. <br />Hawn asked if the applicant objected to planting more trees. <br />Benson stated that she could plant additional trees. <br />PAGE 10 of24