Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. Gaffron /YA, JLA, <br />Title: Planning Director Cljlf~ <br />Date: March 19, 2003 <br />Item No.: <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #01-2714 Frederick Puzak, 1340 Baldur Park Road -Variances - <br />Review Conditions of Resolution No. 4720 <br />List of Exhibits <br />A -Staff letter to applicant of 3-7-03 w/attachments <br />B -Applicant's letters ofrequest 6-20-02, 10-21-02, 2-17-03 <br />C -Resolution No. 4720 <br />D -Septic Design Approval 6-27-02 <br />Summary of Request -Applicant requests Council approval to eliminate the variance approval <br />condition requiring connection of his proposed new residence to sewer. The new septic system <br />constructed in 2002 for the existing house does not have design capacity to serve the proposed 5- <br />bedroom home. In addition to the need for a formal variance renewal (variances expired 11-13- <br />02), the Resolution language provides for Council review because sewer connection is not feasible <br />and construction using a septic system is not consistent with the variance approvals. <br />Background <br />Applicant was granted a number of variances for construction of a new home partially within the 0- <br />7 5' lakeshore setback zone, to replace his existing residence, on November 13, 2001. Resolution No. <br />4720 required that the new residence be connected to municipal sewer, as the property is in the <br />MUSA and within the defined Urban Area of the City. The ability to connect to sewer was <br />predicated on the adjoining property owner, Bill Franklin, granting an easement for extension of the <br />municipal sewer lines. The Resolution contains language indicating that certain conditions will <br />trigger further review by the City Council, i.e.: <br />a) if it is determined that connection to sanitary sewer is not possible; or <br />b) if it is found by City staff that the final construction plans are not consistent with variance <br />approvals. <br />The variance approvals expired last fall without a building permit application being filed by the <br />applicant, and must be renewed before building permits can be issued. However, a number of <br />subsequent factors suggest the need for further Council review of the original approval. These factors <br />B