My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5033
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5000 - 5099 (June 23, 2003 - January 12, 2004)
>
Resolution 5033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 12:27:37 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 12:27:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. ` O,�. . <br /> � . <br /> O 4 . <br /> • '� g CITY of ORONO <br /> ,� � ,. F . <br /> � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ti <br /> ���kEs�I�4�� � NO. � O e3 e� . <br /> NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of <br /> Orono, Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File#03-2936. <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR — 1C zoning district, which requires a � <br /> minimum lot area of '/z acre and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The <br /> applicants' property is .49 acres and has a width of 60 feet. . <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing <br /> . held on August 18, 2003 and recommended approval of the lot area, lot <br /> � width and 250-500' zone hardcover variance based on the following <br /> findings: <br /> • � a. The property is .49 acres in size when .50 acres is required. <br /> b. The property has a lot width of 60 feet at the shoreline and 75' setback <br /> when 100' is required. <br /> c. Because the lot is being review�ed as a rebuild, the lot must conform to <br /> current Zoning Ordinance standards or a hardship shall be presented. <br /> d. Due to the configuration of the lot, minimal area exists in the 250-500' <br /> . � zone, hence a variance to allow excess hardcover for the proposed . <br /> detached garage is not reasonable. <br /> e. Because of sight visibility problems on Casco Circle, a turnaround is � <br /> . necessary to safely exit the drive. <br /> �4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings <br /> and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, <br /> comments by the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed <br /> variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are <br /> peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning <br /> � district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic <br /> �.. <br /> Page 2 of 6 • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.