My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 5015
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 5000 - 5099 (June 23, 2003 - January 12, 2004)
>
Resolution 5015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 12:21:53 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 12:21:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• , ; � <br /> � O� <br /> • O �� ^ O . <br /> - - l CITY of OROND <br /> � - : � <br /> , ti <br /> ��� �G'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> . �kESIIOg' N0. � � .� � � <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on <br /> July 21,2003 and recommended approval of the average lakeshore setback variance <br /> as well as approval of the side yard setback variance, based on the following <br /> findings: � ' <br /> a) The proposed porch addition would not encroach further into the average <br /> lakeshore setback than the existing home. <br /> b) The views of the lake from the neighboring properties would not be affected � <br /> by the proposed addition. - <br /> � c) The eave encroachment is for an"eyebrow"eave that exists between the lsc <br /> and 2°d stories. The continued encroachment of this eave does not detract <br /> from the property or the neighborhood, does not add to the bulk of the <br /> structure in the neighborhood,and does not impact light,air or open space in <br /> � � the neighborhood. <br /> � .. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the public,and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the ' <br /> variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable l�ardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; . <br /> and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> � . <br /> 2 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.